General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This post will probably sink like a stone... [View all]Sympthsical
(10,411 posts)People remember what impacts them.
You mention media figures like Cronkite or David Brinkley. I'm a Millennial, but I only know of them - no experience or really any familiarity with them. They were not of my time. I remember Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather. Or, if one wants to go locally, John Drury, Mary Ann Childers, and Diane Burns from Chicago. I remember Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen, Sammy Sosa, Jose Conseco, etc. etc.
They were prominent in my youth, so they are prominent in my memory. We pay more attention when young and become more scattered as we age. As we get older, our brains, our minds, and our priorities becomes more overstuffed. Not only with new information, but an accumulation of the old. The new begins leaving a less indelible impression than the formative.
We tend to retain what we use. People who do not live and breathe politics are not going to retain a wide swath of political information. (And flatly put, a lot of people who do live and breathe politics aren't great at history or remembering what happened ten or even five years ago - they just think they do. Dunning-Kruger writ internet). I have a degree in history, read a lot of history, and continue to engage in history in my daily life. So, I remember all of it. Ask me about things I learned in psychology just last year, and I might stare blankly. It just never comes up, so the mind discards.
Bemoaning that kids today don't watch black and white films would be like me asking a Boomer why they don't go to vaudeville shows. Gee, don't you like history?! Times change, tastes change, people change, and we all have our own things we enjoy doing and are interested in that is usually rooted in the environments with which we have formative experiences.
It's not an American thing. It's just a human thing.