Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'When You Leave Israel and Enter Gaza, You Are God': Inside the Minds of IDF Soldiers Who Commit War Crimes [View all]Mosby
(17,637 posts)14. The Changing Face of Haaretz: From Critical Voice to Questionable Agenda
The Changing Face of Haaretz: From Critical Voice to Questionable Agenda
As someone who has lived outside of Israel for about a decade but still feels deeply connected to it, Haaretz newspaper has been my primary source for news, analyses, and opinions. Well-known for being a newspaper for thinking people, Haaretz has always stood out intellectually compared to other Israeli newspapers (in fact, I published quite a few opinion pieces in this newspaper in the past).
As is known, the newspaper has always had a clear leftist inclination. Therefore, not surprisingly, many within the Israeli left (including myself) have chosen it to be their main source of news commentary.
However, since the outbreak of war, it seems that the newspaper has primarily become a mechanism seeking to promote a certain worldview, even at the expense of compromising its basic and superior commitment to its readers: presenting facts as they are.
Editors, newsroom staff, and writers at the paper are focused on disseminating an agenda that seeks to portray Israel in its worst light. Often, this is done by relying on information from sources whose reliability is at least questionable. For example, one out of many, the newspaper persistently repeats the casualty figures in Gaza and their types (most of them women and children), knowing that the source of this information is the Hamas Health Ministry, entirely controlled by the unreliable Hamas terror group. The same organization currently claims that the vast majority of those killed on October 7 were victims of the IDF and that the abduction of women and children was an unintended consequence of the chaos prevailing in the area.
My difficulty with Haaretz and its editors and writers is not the audible criticism they level against the Israeli government (the most disastrous government weve known) or their criticism of the war (although Haaretz is good at criticizing, it is much less good at suggesting reasonable alternatives). The difficulty lies in the realization that Haaretzs writers come in bad faith. The impression is that they are not interested in the welfare of the State of Israel.
Many of its writers exude self-hatred and hollow righteousness. Their opinions, even if not all of them, seek and act to further demoralize Israelis. To make them feel more defeated and pessimistic. All of this stems from what sometimes seems like a pathological joy of bitter people, haters of their people, and themselves.
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-changing-face-of-haaretz-from-critical-voice-to-questionable-agenda/
Haaretz co-owner Leonid Nevzlin criticizes publishers remarks on Israels wartime actions
Amos Schocken, the newspapers publisher, described Israels governance in these territories as a cruel apartheid regime and referred to certain Palestinian terrorists as freedom fighters.
Leonid Nevzlin, co-owner of Haaretz, publicly expressed his strong disagreement on Friday with statements made by Amos Schocken, the newspapers publisher, regarding Israels policies in the West Bank and Gaza.
Schockens remarks at a Haaretz conference in London described Israels governance in these territories as a cruel apartheid regime and referred to certain Palestinian terrorists as freedom fighters.
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-827303
Haaretz is trash.
As someone who has lived outside of Israel for about a decade but still feels deeply connected to it, Haaretz newspaper has been my primary source for news, analyses, and opinions. Well-known for being a newspaper for thinking people, Haaretz has always stood out intellectually compared to other Israeli newspapers (in fact, I published quite a few opinion pieces in this newspaper in the past).
As is known, the newspaper has always had a clear leftist inclination. Therefore, not surprisingly, many within the Israeli left (including myself) have chosen it to be their main source of news commentary.
However, since the outbreak of war, it seems that the newspaper has primarily become a mechanism seeking to promote a certain worldview, even at the expense of compromising its basic and superior commitment to its readers: presenting facts as they are.
Editors, newsroom staff, and writers at the paper are focused on disseminating an agenda that seeks to portray Israel in its worst light. Often, this is done by relying on information from sources whose reliability is at least questionable. For example, one out of many, the newspaper persistently repeats the casualty figures in Gaza and their types (most of them women and children), knowing that the source of this information is the Hamas Health Ministry, entirely controlled by the unreliable Hamas terror group. The same organization currently claims that the vast majority of those killed on October 7 were victims of the IDF and that the abduction of women and children was an unintended consequence of the chaos prevailing in the area.
My difficulty with Haaretz and its editors and writers is not the audible criticism they level against the Israeli government (the most disastrous government weve known) or their criticism of the war (although Haaretz is good at criticizing, it is much less good at suggesting reasonable alternatives). The difficulty lies in the realization that Haaretzs writers come in bad faith. The impression is that they are not interested in the welfare of the State of Israel.
Many of its writers exude self-hatred and hollow righteousness. Their opinions, even if not all of them, seek and act to further demoralize Israelis. To make them feel more defeated and pessimistic. All of this stems from what sometimes seems like a pathological joy of bitter people, haters of their people, and themselves.
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-changing-face-of-haaretz-from-critical-voice-to-questionable-agenda/
Haaretz co-owner Leonid Nevzlin criticizes publishers remarks on Israels wartime actions
Amos Schocken, the newspapers publisher, described Israels governance in these territories as a cruel apartheid regime and referred to certain Palestinian terrorists as freedom fighters.
Leonid Nevzlin, co-owner of Haaretz, publicly expressed his strong disagreement on Friday with statements made by Amos Schocken, the newspapers publisher, regarding Israels policies in the West Bank and Gaza.
Schockens remarks at a Haaretz conference in London described Israels governance in these territories as a cruel apartheid regime and referred to certain Palestinian terrorists as freedom fighters.
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-827303
Haaretz is trash.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'When You Leave Israel and Enter Gaza, You Are God': Inside the Minds of IDF Soldiers Who Commit War Crimes [View all]
WhiskeyGrinder
Monday
OP
It's hilarious that you imagine Hamas' surrender would end Bibi's deliberate war of aggression
Orrex
Yesterday
#26
false framing, Haaretz is one of the Israeli newspapers of record and is simply documenting things that you do not like
Celerity
Monday
#6
The proper syntax is how much (not how many) is being posted, and it's not just limited to coming from Israel proper
Celerity
Monday
#22
No, they did not. AP Votecast & Fox found 63 percent of Muslims voted Harris, CAIR found 53% voted Stein, neither
Celerity
Monday
#23
That is not what you claimed, and only the suspect CAIR poll shows Harris not the winner of a majority of Muslim votes.
Celerity
Yesterday
#25