Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mosby

(17,637 posts)
14. The Changing Face of Haaretz: From Critical Voice to Questionable Agenda
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 08:46 PM
Monday
The Changing Face of Haaretz: From Critical Voice to Questionable Agenda

As someone who has lived outside of Israel for about a decade but still feels deeply connected to it, Haaretz newspaper has been my primary source for news, analyses, and opinions. Well-known for being a “newspaper for thinking people,” Haaretz has always stood out intellectually compared to other Israeli newspapers (in fact, I published quite a few opinion pieces in this newspaper in the past).

As is known, the newspaper has always had a clear leftist inclination. Therefore, not surprisingly, many within the Israeli left (including myself) have chosen it to be their main source of news commentary.

However, since the outbreak of war, it seems that the newspaper has primarily become a mechanism seeking to promote a certain worldview, even at the expense of compromising its basic and superior commitment to its readers: presenting facts as they are.

Editors, newsroom staff, and writers at the paper are focused on disseminating an agenda that seeks to portray Israel in its worst light. Often, this is done by relying on information from sources whose reliability is at least questionable. For example, one out of many, the newspaper persistently repeats the casualty figures in Gaza and their types (“most of them women and children”), knowing that the source of this information is the Hamas Health Ministry, entirely controlled by the unreliable Hamas terror group. The same organization currently claims that the vast majority of those killed on October 7 were victims of the IDF and that the abduction of women and children was an “unintended consequence” of the “chaos prevailing in the area”.

My difficulty with Haaretz and its editors and writers is not the audible criticism they level against the Israeli government (the most disastrous government we’ve known) or their criticism of the war (although Haaretz is good at criticizing, it is much less good at suggesting reasonable alternatives). The difficulty lies in the realization that Haaretz’s writers “come in bad faith.” The impression is that they are not interested in the welfare of the State of Israel.

Many of its writers exude self-hatred and hollow righteousness. Their opinions, even if not all of them, seek and act to further demoralize Israelis. To make them feel more defeated and pessimistic. All of this stems from what sometimes seems like a pathological joy of bitter people, haters of their people, and themselves.

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-changing-face-of-haaretz-from-critical-voice-to-questionable-agenda/

Haaretz co-owner Leonid Nevzlin criticizes publisher’s remarks on Israel’s wartime actions

Amos Schocken, the newspaper’s publisher, described Israel’s governance in these territories as a “cruel apartheid regime” and referred to certain Palestinian terrorists as “freedom fighters.

Leonid Nevzlin, co-owner of Haaretz, publicly expressed his strong disagreement on Friday with statements made by Amos Schocken, the newspaper’s publisher, regarding Israel’s policies in the West Bank and Gaza.

Schocken’s remarks at a Haaretz conference in London described Israel’s governance in these territories as a “cruel apartheid regime” and referred to certain Palestinian terrorists as “freedom fighters.”

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-827303

Haaretz is trash.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hamas should surrender ZRB Monday #1
You are blaming this behavior on Hamas? Big Blue Marble Monday #4
Post removed Post removed Monday #10
That would be tragic. N/T Big Blue Marble Monday #12
"Look what you made us do" is the mentality of abusers & psychopaths Avalon Sparks Monday #16
It's the only card that Bibi's apologists have to play Orrex Yesterday #27
It's hilarious that you imagine Hamas' surrender would end Bibi's deliberate war of aggression Orrex Yesterday #26
archive link Celerity Monday #2
Brainwashed monsters malaise Monday #3
Trashing yet another pro-Terrorist thread DeepWinter Monday #5
false framing, Haaretz is one of the Israeli newspapers of record and is simply documenting things that you do not like Celerity Monday #6
Totally agree. I'm a Haaretz subscriber. Mike 03 Monday #8
The Changing Face of Haaretz: From Critical Voice to Questionable Agenda Mosby Monday #14
Offended by everything, ashamed by nothing. Avalon Sparks Monday #15
No such thing as karma Mosby Monday #17
More lies Avalon Sparks Monday #20
unrec Intractable Monday #9
"breaks his arm at the elbow and his leg here. " Intractable Monday #7
War makes monsters of combatants. maxsolomon Monday #11
suppertime kick WhiskeyGrinder Monday #13
How many hasbara here spapeggy Monday #18
The proper syntax is how much (not how many) is being posted, and it's not just limited to coming from Israel proper Celerity Monday #22
I can think of at least one who might fit that criteria Rob H. Yesterday #32
Aren't European Jew who migrated to Israel in 40's the real anti-Semites? Jit423 Monday #19
Who are you talking about? Mosby Yesterday #33
Arab-Americans overwhelmingly voted for King Donnie Blue_Tires Monday #21
No, they did not. AP Votecast & Fox found 63 percent of Muslims voted Harris, CAIR found 53% voted Stein, neither Celerity Monday #23
A vote for Stein was still a vote for Trump Blue_Tires Yesterday #24
That is not what you claimed, and only the suspect CAIR poll shows Harris not the winner of a majority of Muslim votes. Celerity Yesterday #25
Fine, I'll stand slightly corrected... Blue_Tires Yesterday #28
We both agree that Harris did get hurt by far too many Muslims not voting for her. And I, like you, condemn those who Celerity Yesterday #29
When do the protests at Bedminster and Mar-a-Lago start? thebigidea Yesterday #30
There was a good article at Commondreams a few days ago, too Rob H. Yesterday #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'When You Leave Israel an...»Reply #14