General Discussion

LW1977

(1,413 posts)

16. Won't hear that from me!

Reply to uponit7771 (Reply #11)

Mon Dec 23, 2024, 01:46 PM

Monday

The cowardly lion would be a better AG

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bettie calimary

105 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Garland let Gaetz walk [View all] Mr.WeRP Monday OP

Well, basically, piddyprints Monday #1

Kirsten Gillibrand Fullduplexxx Monday #4

Plus 38 other Senators SocialDemocrat61 Monday #21

I haven't really forgiven those Senators LakeArenal Monday #54

I'm a fan of Chris Murphy but his joining the Franklin lynch mob, dem4decades Monday #56

Murphy also voted to confirm Aileen Cannon judgeship DeeDeeNY Yesterday #94

Also, Kamala Harris was the first Democratic Senator to go on national televsion and call for Franken to resign Celerity Monday #83

Great summary SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #88

This is so old and tired, pick one woman and eviscerate her. LizBeth Monday #27

Garland is a waste of space NotHardly Monday #13

What 3auld6phart Monday #25

He didn't. He chose to resign. Groundhawg Monday #24

Only ONE senator made Al Franken resign Charging Triceratops Monday #36

Franken was right to resign GoreWon2000 18 hrs ago #104

He was too progressive. Lunabell Monday #86

Wrong awesomerwb1 20 hrs ago #101

Neo liberalism is dead. Lunabell 16 hrs ago #105

Sexual harassment is a serious issue GoreWon2000 18 hrs ago #103

To be fair the only federal charge here would have been the Mann act dsc Monday #2

They could have damn near copy and pasted Diddy's indictments. W_HAMILTON Monday #18

did she witness the travel part and the money part dsc Monday #20

According to the report, there was no Mann Act violation or federal sex trafficking... reACTIONary Monday #66

DOJ did not share it's evidence gab13by13 Monday #76

DOJ did not share evidence, and they did not prosecute either, so.... reACTIONary Monday #79

you clearly didn't read Diddy's indictments krawhitham Yesterday #89

Not if he was using or distributing Drugs in DC itself. The DOJ does this type of prosecutions in the district. mackdaddy Monday #23

That is a fair point dsc Monday #40

I see no specific allegations in the report concerning the drugs. Wiz Imp Monday #52

According to the report, there was no violation of the Mann act because.... reACTIONary Monday #64

Only If Southern_gent 21 hrs ago #100

Garland was protecting the long-cherished insitution of federal sex-trafficking. sop Monday #3

By Congressman Fullduplexxx Monday #5

Child rapist and insurrection lover. onecaliberal Monday #19

According to the report, there was no Federal sex trafficking... reACTIONary Monday #67

He's just waiting for a really, really big case like a homeless person stealing a loaf of bread from the congressional yaesu Monday #6

Maybe he'll give the federalist society another entertaining talk someday on this. Think. Again. Monday #7

Garland had that evidence 3 years ago. gab13by13 Monday #8

Elon Musk has been violating security protocols since 2022. gab13by13 Monday #9

Odds are better that Pam will before Merrick the Meek would. republianmushroom Monday #61

Typical Garland behavior. And 3 years later too. Why so long? Am I surprised? NO. I'm disgusted w/ him SWBTATTReg Monday #10

Leave Garland Alllllooooooooonnnnneee !!!! (in 3 .... 2 ..... 1) uponit7771 Monday #11

Won't hear that from me! LW1977 Monday #16

The DOJ will not touch Members of Congress who are criminals and traitors. Irish_Dem Monday #12

President Biden made many a good decision in his tenure, Garland was NOT one of them. n/t SheilaAnn Monday #14

Fuck Garland! LW1977 Monday #15

What part of the report suggests the DOJ Ms. Toad Monday #17

News flash: Prosecutors don't always win their cases. But the facts emerge at trial Bobstandard Monday #32

Prosecutors don't bring cases they don't believe they have a reasonable chance of winning. Ms. Toad Monday #46

Exactly Wiz Imp Monday #48

You mistake the letter of the law for justice. nt Bobstandard Monday #55

In a court of law.... reACTIONary Monday #72

Nope. Despite its name, the Department of Justice lives within the letter of the law. Ms. Toad Monday #82

You illustrate what's wrong with the system Bobstandard 22 hrs ago #96

The citizenry includes people like Ms. Toad 21 hrs ago #98

Prosecuting a case without evidence to convict is .... reACTIONary Monday #71

"what do Garland apologists have to say now?"...I have the same question. I remember when I spoke against Garland Escurumbele Monday #22

They'll ask where you got your law degree. nt Hotler Monday #29

Perhaps they'll invoke their anonymous, well-placed sources Orrex Monday #65

And then they'll call you names. It'll be grand. Scrivener7 Yesterday #95

That would be a good question. reACTIONary Monday #73

I've noticed a disturbing trend here at DU; every time AOC issues a statement robbob Monday #45

You made some important (bottom line) points. yellow dahlia Monday #57

but...but...he arrested hundreds with beards and tattoos - SWOON! Noel Kums Monday #26

"and to have purchased and used illegal drugs, including from his Capitol Hill office," Hotler Monday #28

Here is the report's description.... reACTIONary Monday #75

All the things that the Nazipublicans did in the past 4 years... dchill Monday #30

Makes me wonder if Garland is a johnnyfins Monday #31

To be clear, the reported results of the investigation moniss Monday #33

Whether he knew the girl was 17 is irrelevant to the law. But the statute of limitations ran out in 2020 anyway. Wiz Imp Monday #49

In addition.... reACTIONary Monday #68

I believe you are correct. Wiz Imp Monday #69

As I said trying to do the case of the 17 year old moniss Monday #85

And here in Florida, there's people in jail for 12 months because they smoked a God-Damn ONE joint. chouchou Monday #34

Arguably the worst AG in American history. paleotn Monday #35

Why didn't Biden fire Garland a couple of years ago, when this pattern became obvious. TheRickles Monday #37

I believe Pres. Biden didn't fire his less than adequate Cabinet Secretaries and appointees, because... yellow dahlia Monday #59

Statutory rape is a .... reACTIONary Monday #38

You have obviously skipped over many responses Mr.WeRP Monday #41

Your right! There are lots of responses and most of them.... reACTIONary Monday #47

Link Mr.WeRP Monday #53

From replies to that comment... reACTIONary Monday #70

Sure there weren't. I have read the report and there is certainly probable cause. Mr.WeRP Monday #74

There certainly is probable cause... reACTIONary Monday #78

Plenty of crimes Gaetz committed that DoJ could have prosecuted for that came out of the evidence collected by the ethic Wiz Imp Monday #51

Statute of limitations ran out on the statutory rape in 2020 anyway. Wiz Imp Monday #50

Good thing 3auld6phart Monday #39

I would have preferred him there ecstatic Monday #42

He needs to pay the taxpayers back every cent of his salary he received. lees1975 Monday #43

Shameful North Coast Lawyer Monday #44

One must understand the need for patience. republianmushroom Monday #58

Bigger fish Diraven Monday #60

And claudette Monday #62

Dereliction of duty Evolve Dammit Monday #63

Disappointing robleb Monday #77

Is this really a surprise? Janbdwl72 Monday #80

Garland is hands down Buden's worst cabinet pick BluenFLA Monday #81

So did Pam Bondi. Cattledog Monday #84

which state laws could he have been tried on? onenote 21 hrs ago #97

Because Garland is a timid WIMP Across-the-Desk Yesterday #87

Bill Barr was the Attorney General overseeing the investigation of Matt Gaetz when it started. summer_in_TX Yesterday #90

Had to build a case really, really thoroughly. nilram Yesterday #91

I really had... 2naSalit Yesterday #92

Everyone who supports Biden is a Garland apologist Kaleva Yesterday #93

One would ponder if MG has young girls/boys in his closet. Clouds Passing 21 hrs ago #99

This message was self-deleted by its author republianmushroom 19 hrs ago #102