Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Callie1979

(284 posts)
72. Is there any evidence that anything was hacked? Any fraudulent counts? No.
Thu Dec 19, 2024, 06:03 PM
Thursday

I believe if you wanted to go ahead & push for a recount based on no evidence a judge would likely toss your request.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

All polls are subjective Nigrum Cattus Dec 18 #1
When you realize keepthemhonestO Dec 18 #15
I was thinking that same thing. luvallpeeps Dec 18 #2
A lot of minds thinking alike on this forum...of course. yellow dahlia Dec 18 #3
There are rules for recounts. Iowa was nowhere NEAR the requirements. Callie1979 Dec 18 #11
Those rules are for state paid recounts. But recounts can be requested and paid for by the candidate Figarosmom Dec 18 #17
You mean the candidate that's some $20 million in debt? Seeking Serenity Dec 18 #37
Yeah it is Figarosmom Dec 18 #40
Harris apparently had no interest in scamming her supporters out of millions of dollars tritsofme Thursday #46
Yes, there are rules for recounts Farmer-Rick Dec 18 #19
You didn't understand my reference to recounts. yellow dahlia Dec 18 #21
Just because a pollster is wrong doesnt mean the numbers "dont match up" Callie1979 Dec 18 #38
Democrats said repeatedly that trump was entitled to do as many recounts as he wanted to pay for and rainin Thursday #49
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Thursday #51
No one is saying Harris isn't "allowed" to question the results. She has chosen not to question them. tritsofme Thursday #53
You believe without evidence that her not doing any rainin Thursday #56
The Harris campaign and DNC have elite lawyers and experts. Someone like Marc Elias would be all over any actual problem tritsofme Thursday #61
2000. Gore. rainin Thursday #65
Nope. Trump had to be done with recounts by Dec 14th! It's the law. LeftInTX Friday #90
So all they have to do is hack the election and alter the count past the margin that would require a recount. nt pnwmom Thursday #67
Is there any evidence that anything was hacked? Any fraudulent counts? No. Callie1979 Thursday #72
All the states should have paper ballots and do an automatic recount of a portion by hand pnwmom Friday #102
Yep. And democrats will scream 'accept the results!" rainin Friday #96
Interesting. returnee Thursday #69
Is there any proof of the vote being rigged? Machines hacked? No, there's not Callie1979 Thursday #74
As far as I can see... returnee Thursday #83
Sorry, no other polls showed Harris winning. Not even Harris's OWN polls. Callie1979 Thursday #85
Wrong by so much? returnee Friday #94
Trump is a sore winner. This lawsuit will be thrown out! LeftInTX Dec 18 #4
Something still smells rotten KS Toronado Dec 18 #5
She was leading in the polls but lost in turnout. LisaM Dec 18 #16
I remember she wasn't leading and everyone was saying, "The polls are wrong and are Republican polls" LeftInTX Thursday #41
We ran the wrong candidate. Frank D. Lincoln Thursday #42
We didn't have a primary TheFarseer Thursday #52
I certainly wanted Shapiro for VP. But the top wouldve been fine too Callie1979 Thursday #76
Facts are awkward things. Thank you for sharing this EdmondDantes_ Thursday #44
Harris' own internal polls showed this as well Sympthsical Thursday #60
For all campaign. Biden/Harris internals had them at best tied in most swing states... Self Esteem Thursday #78
I admittedly fell into the same trap Sympthsical Thursday #80
I don't necessarily think it was a trap...it definitely felt like the vibes had shifted. Self Esteem Thursday #82
This is the truth. The polls were actually correct. We just cherrypicked which polls we liked. Self Esteem Thursday #73
Except the voters did turn out down ballot. Supposedly millions of solid democrats voted D up and down the ballot pnwmom Thursday #68
That's hardly the only potential answer EdmondDantes_ Thursday #70
That's not true. It's actually the other way around. Self Esteem Thursday #79
Where did you get your numbers? That's not what this analysis says. pnwmom Thursday #84
The actual results. Self Esteem Friday #86
You must have a link then. Here's more about mine. pnwmom Friday #87
It's not hard to find. Self Esteem Friday #103
The results are from the official results. Not a blog. LeftInTX Friday #89
But combining the votes for Harris and Trump into a total covers up the fact pnwmom Friday #91
You specifically said they left president blank!!!! So is it switcharoo??? LeftInTX Friday #92
Did you run "all kinds of tests" on the day of the election? Because it came out in court in 2022 pnwmom Sunday #104
We have 500 machines. They are all locked and guarded behind barb wire! A hacker would need to access each machine! LeftInTX Sunday #105
Harris performed about 3 points worse in NM than Biden did. tritsofme Sunday #106
Trump is a master of projection DeeDeeNY Dec 18 #22
Doesn't sound paranoid to me. yellow dahlia Dec 18 #29
Your points are all valid, yellow dahlia Dec 18 #23
Harris' internal polls never showed her ahead in battlegrounds Sympthsical Thursday #57
he also said he'd get 100 million votes this time. Callie1979 Thursday #75
You could take a poll today and due to some doc03 Dec 18 #6
That's his plan. maxsolomon Dec 18 #7
That is his buisiness plan I guess sue and doc03 Dec 18 #10
Right - he says he is ready to spend money on lawsuits. yellow dahlia Dec 18 #25
"I dont know how he could win other than just forcing them to spend millions to defend themselves." SunSeeker Dec 18 #8
I think the people and entities, who can afford it, should say: bring it on. yellow dahlia Dec 18 #27
There's this thing in statistics called "outliers" mchill Dec 18 #9
I was just saying the same thing yellow dahlia Dec 18 #28
I suppose with ridiculous lawsuits come ridiculous theories. tritsofme Dec 18 #12
I'll have a tall glass of Discovery, with Selzer and a wedge of lime BoRaGard Dec 18 #13
Her poll might be correct, but assume Johonny Dec 18 #14
Something does smell Cherokee100 Dec 18 #18
And the bomb threats at certain precincts on election day. yellow dahlia Dec 18 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 18 #32
This cilla4progress Dec 18 #20
Selzer's polling was desperately and embarrassingly wrong. End of. stopdiggin Dec 18 #24
"Us" live love laugh Dec 18 #26
I could not find that Ann Selzer said that. yellow dahlia Dec 18 #34
she missed the IA result by a whopping 16 points stopdiggin Dec 18 #35
Please do not put words in my mouth, yellow dahlia Dec 18 #36
and yet, said poll - when all is said and done - was desperately at odds with the actual result. stopdiggin Dec 18 #39
Link to where she said that? obamanut2012 Thursday #59
No kidding - Selzer's poll may well have been the worst poll since the infamous Literary Digest poll in 1936 predicted Midwestern Democrat Friday #99
Selzer apparently HAD a very fine career, an excellent record stopdiggin Friday #101
We're never getting a hand recount, so who knows? Karasu Dec 18 #31
I believe that karin_sj Dec 18 #33
The unreported aspect is how many had uncounted provisional ballots, rejected mail-in ballots, ... Festivito Thursday #43
Good points. Define free and fair. n/t yellow dahlia Thursday #50
Compare and contrast: justice system versus Justice system. Festivito Thursday #55
I've had that thought.. dchill Thursday #45
Lol Polybius Thursday #47
That poll was an outlier as all of the other polls showed Trump winning but not by as much as he did andym Thursday #48
Can we also sue him for thinking he'll win California and New York? Norbert Thursday #54
Sure! LeftInTX Thursday #62
People here know I am not a tinfoiler, but I think her poll was dead on right obamanut2012 Thursday #58
There are more reasons to believe it was right, than not. IMHO yellow dahlia Thursday #71
I Can't Get Excited RobinA Thursday #63
"Hmmmm....." Indeed! BadGimp Thursday #64
Aren't polls just snapshots of moments in time. If you Nixie Thursday #66
Thats what i think! sunflowerseed Thursday #77
Considering Trump won Iowa by 13 points iemanja Thursday #81
What would that prove? Kaleva Friday #88
Nothing, except proving he cheated. Emile Friday #93
Or somebody screwed up in one state Kaleva Friday #95
It's not the poll that's "wrong" Patton French Friday #97
I never believed he won fairly Dem4life1234 Friday #98
I am looking at it through the same lens as you. yellow dahlia Friday #100
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe Ann Selzer's poll w...»Reply #72