Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Deadline: Legal Blog What happens next in Trump's GA election case after court disqualifies Fani Willis? [View all]
The appeals court reversed a trial court ruling that let the Fulton County district attorney and her office stay on the case. But it didn't dismiss the case itself.
https://bsky.app/profile/aniyamaria.bsky.social/post/3ldo5ksvcrk2e
Confirmation of how the Right fears her. Will another prosecutor take it up in a post-Trump era?
Georgia appeals court disqualifies Fani Willis from Trump election prosecution
Georgia appeals court disqualifies Fani Willis from Trump election prosecution
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/georgia-court-disqualifies-fani-willis-trump-election-rcna184839
UPDATE (Dec. 19, 12:57 p.m. ET): Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis office has filed a notice of intent to appeal Thursdays decision disqualifying her and her office from prosecuting the state election interference case against Donald Trump and others. Thursdays decision was issued by the Georgia appeals court and Willis notice signaled her intention to petition the states supreme court to review the ruling.
A divided three-judge panel of the Georgia appeals court ruled that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her office should be disqualified from prosecuting the state election interference case against Donald Trump and others......
Reversing McAfees resolution, the majority stressed that Willis hadnt appealed the trial judges finding that there was an appearance of impropriety. Accordingly, whether the evidence presented to the trial court adequately supported, under the appropriate standard of review on appeal, its finding of the existence of an appearance of impropriety is not before this Court, the panel majority explained.
Instead, it continued, we must determine whether the remedy fashioned by the trial court for this undisputed finding of a significant appearance of impropriety was improper as contended by the appellants. The appeals court concluded that it was, so it reversed that aspect of McAfee's ruling.
The appeals court declined to dismiss the indictment as the defense requested, but Willis and her office being kicked off the case adds uncertainty to how it can continue. If the ruling stands after any further appeal taken by Willis to the state supreme court, it's unclear when a new office or prosecutor would take on the complex prosecution against Trump and several co-defendants. Trump would likely not face criminal proceedings while he's in office after he's inaugurated next month but other co-defendants remain in the case. So even though the appeals court declined to dismiss the case, it remains to be seen whether the disqualification ruling effectively amounts to a dismissal if it stops the case from moving forward.
A dissenting judge said the majoritys opinion was unsupported by law and called it particularly troubling that the majority interfered with the trial judges discretion. Given the unique role of the trial court and the fact that it is the court which has broad discretion to impose a remedy that fits the situation as it finds it to be, we should resist the temptation to interfere with that discretion, including its chosen remedy, just because we happen to see things differently, Judge Ben Land wrote in the dissent that would likely be cited by Willis and her office if they appeal. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution noted that all three judges are GOP appointees and the outlet reported that Willis is expected to appeal to the state top court
A divided three-judge panel of the Georgia appeals court ruled that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her office should be disqualified from prosecuting the state election interference case against Donald Trump and others......
Reversing McAfees resolution, the majority stressed that Willis hadnt appealed the trial judges finding that there was an appearance of impropriety. Accordingly, whether the evidence presented to the trial court adequately supported, under the appropriate standard of review on appeal, its finding of the existence of an appearance of impropriety is not before this Court, the panel majority explained.
Instead, it continued, we must determine whether the remedy fashioned by the trial court for this undisputed finding of a significant appearance of impropriety was improper as contended by the appellants. The appeals court concluded that it was, so it reversed that aspect of McAfee's ruling.
The appeals court declined to dismiss the indictment as the defense requested, but Willis and her office being kicked off the case adds uncertainty to how it can continue. If the ruling stands after any further appeal taken by Willis to the state supreme court, it's unclear when a new office or prosecutor would take on the complex prosecution against Trump and several co-defendants. Trump would likely not face criminal proceedings while he's in office after he's inaugurated next month but other co-defendants remain in the case. So even though the appeals court declined to dismiss the case, it remains to be seen whether the disqualification ruling effectively amounts to a dismissal if it stops the case from moving forward.
A dissenting judge said the majoritys opinion was unsupported by law and called it particularly troubling that the majority interfered with the trial judges discretion. Given the unique role of the trial court and the fact that it is the court which has broad discretion to impose a remedy that fits the situation as it finds it to be, we should resist the temptation to interfere with that discretion, including its chosen remedy, just because we happen to see things differently, Judge Ben Land wrote in the dissent that would likely be cited by Willis and her office if they appeal. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution noted that all three judges are GOP appointees and the outlet reported that Willis is expected to appeal to the state top court
This ruling is sketchy. I am glad that DA Willis is appealing
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deadline: Legal Blog What happens next in Trump's GA election case after court disqualifies Fani Willis? [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 19
OP
Fani has TFG's ass. The appeals court knows this. I'm so happy she appealing this.
bluestarone
Dec 19
#2