General Discussion

First of all, I didn't really watch. Just listened. So the unmade bed didn't bother me.

He's talking, without ever saying so, about the UHC CEO murder.

He talks about the history of the Conquistadors and the Dutch East India Company, both endeavors that spread the responsibility for grave injustice so thin that it practically disappears.

Then he does a thought experiment about a "loophole" in the law that allows you to kill people--random people whom you've never met--with impunity, and to profit from it by getting their stuff. (I'm not really doing his thought process justice here.)

His conclusion is that this "loophole" does no one any good. Not the society, not the victims, and not the murderer himself, mostly because of the anger and resentment building up in society that leads to things like (though he never says so explicitly) the UHC murder, and the celebration of it by so many people.

He says it better.