Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,898 posts)
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 08:02 PM Tuesday

Breaking: Judge Cannon pulls illegal stunt to help Trump - Brian Tyler Cohen



No summary provided. I suggest listening to the video or watching the transcript available through YouTube since I don't believe I can provide an adequate and accurate summary myself.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: Judge Cannon pulls illegal stunt to help Trump - Brian Tyler Cohen (Original Post) TexasTowelie Tuesday OP
'No basis': Experts believe Aileen Cannon may not have power to block Jack Smith report LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #1
So if she has no authority for the order she made, wnylib Tuesday #2
Do not ask for it kacekwl Tuesday #4
That's what I think, but will Biden agree? wnylib Tuesday #5
At what point does kacekwl Tuesday #3

LetMyPeopleVote

(156,178 posts)
1. 'No basis': Experts believe Aileen Cannon may not have power to block Jack Smith report
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 08:13 PM
Tuesday

Loose Cannon does not have jurisdiction to issue this order. Again Loose Cannon is auditioning for a seat on the SCOTUS



https://www.rawstory.com/aileen-cannon-2670761472

MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin on Tuesday questioned whether Judge Aileen Cannon has the authority to block the United States Department of Justice from releasing special counsel Jack Smith's report on his two criminal investigations into President-elect Donald Trump.

"It is not clear... whether she has jurisdiction because earlier this year, she threw out the Mar-a-Lago documents case explaining that, from her reasoning, Jack Smith did not have constitutional authority to bring that prosecution under the appointments clause of the Constitution," she said.

"And so there is no basis here to block the report in part because it is not clear there is a case or controversy in front of her, but if there were, the argument that Trump is making that presidential immunity also precludes the release of the report is a stretch of the Supreme Court's ruling that a president cannot be prosecuted for acts having to do with his presidency while he is a sitting president."

Legal analyst Barbara McQuade, meanwhile, speculated that Cannon's move was simply to help Trump run out the clock until his inauguration on January 20th.

"I don't think she has any jurisdiction, but delay is the name of the game," she said. "If they can stop the clock until January 20th then the Department of Justice will be a Trump appointee and they will kill the whole thing. That's the goal here."


wnylib

(25,007 posts)
2. So if she has no authority for the order she made,
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 09:11 PM
Tuesday

then the order can be ignored.

But I would not count on Garland to release the information anyway, with or without an unauthorized order from traitor Cannon.

Biden should release the report, IF he receives it. But will he receive it? And would he release it?

wnylib

(25,007 posts)
5. That's what I think, but will Biden agree?
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 10:50 PM
Tuesday

Will the report even be given to him?

The American people have a right to know. It won't change the outcome of the election, but we have a right to know the results of the investigation of the man who will be sworn in this month. If the information is not made public now, it will get destroyed and lost to history.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Breaking: Judge Cannon pu...