Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumBreaking: Judge Cannon pulls illegal stunt to help Trump - Brian Tyler Cohen
No summary provided. I suggest listening to the video or watching the transcript available through YouTube since I don't believe I can provide an adequate and accurate summary myself.
LetMyPeopleVote
(156,178 posts)Loose Cannon does not have jurisdiction to issue this order. Again Loose Cannon is auditioning for a seat on the SCOTUS
Link to tweet
https://www.rawstory.com/aileen-cannon-2670761472
"It is not clear... whether she has jurisdiction because earlier this year, she threw out the Mar-a-Lago documents case explaining that, from her reasoning, Jack Smith did not have constitutional authority to bring that prosecution under the appointments clause of the Constitution," she said.
"And so there is no basis here to block the report in part because it is not clear there is a case or controversy in front of her, but if there were, the argument that Trump is making that presidential immunity also precludes the release of the report is a stretch of the Supreme Court's ruling that a president cannot be prosecuted for acts having to do with his presidency while he is a sitting president."
Legal analyst Barbara McQuade, meanwhile, speculated that Cannon's move was simply to help Trump run out the clock until his inauguration on January 20th.
"I don't think she has any jurisdiction, but delay is the name of the game," she said. "If they can stop the clock until January 20th then the Department of Justice will be a Trump appointee and they will kill the whole thing. That's the goal here."
wnylib
(25,007 posts)then the order can be ignored.
But I would not count on Garland to release the information anyway, with or without an unauthorized order from traitor Cannon.
Biden should release the report, IF he receives it. But will he receive it? And would he release it?
kacekwl
(7,685 posts)Demand it now. You are the President after all go out with a bang
wnylib
(25,007 posts)Will the report even be given to him?
The American people have a right to know. It won't change the outcome of the election, but we have a right to know the results of the investigation of the man who will be sworn in this month. If the information is not made public now, it will get destroyed and lost to history.
kacekwl
(7,685 posts)everyone ignore this obviously biased corrupt "judge".