I think it will resonate with voters.

I do wonder about the site you linked to, though. Not a single senate Republican ranked as "extremely conservative"? I mean, what exactly does one have to do to be considered that? At least the house has quite a few of them. I take it to mean "extremely conservative" only refers to the extreme of the extremes?

If so, proud to have both my senators in the strong liberal category. Wyden and Merkley have been great.

past time to start letting people know what the Dem Party can be, how it can and did become the Party of the People rather than continuing down the Corporate path that clearly is not resonating with voters.

We need to get people to see that the reason that this is such a "great country" is only because of liberal policies spearheaded by the Roosevelt Administration and others.

We have to keep pushing back against the constant propaganda of the right wing and corporatist Democrats. The title "liberal" needs to become something to be proud of again. I also think that changing the way people view the word "socialism" will be key. The people support us, but they don't realize it, and that's what we most need to change. If we make it so that the right can't use those words for their narrative, they lose the power and we gain it.

I know the Right, or the extremists on the Right, attack Liberals. But it is not just the Right anymore, the Third Way hate and despise FDR and Liberals as much as, if not more than, the Right. And they part of our party now. So THEY need to be fought against even more than the Right imo.

100% agree--we can't fight the right until we aren't the right. We have to be liberals, not right-wing Democrats, if we are going to have any chance in 2016 or of pulling our party back to supporting the people and not the corporations.

be persuaded that the 'lesser evil', or 'anyone but Bush' was better even though we were uneasy about it. But those days are gone. We've seen the result of those tactics and now people are energized again, on the Left I mean, to reestablish themselves in the Party and hopefully to take it back from Corporate infiltrators.

When people look at issues the majority come down on the liberal side. We need to revive FDR's second bill of rights and hammer the public with it.

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I've described myself as an FDR Democrat for a long time (or a Kennedy Democrat, but not quite as much).

Bringing Eleanor's and Teddy's philosophies and ideas into the mix gives the Roosevelt Democrat moniker so much more depth!

....would object to the use of the name.

FDR might be a better choice, as it is a nickname and thus not so proprietary.

The Roosevelt (or FDR) party, should use the word Employees, instead of Labor or Workers or Proletarians. No one relates to those old terms. We're an Employee Nation, & we want FDR's social safety net strengthened & improved.

But I could switch to Roosevelt.

It's Dutch for "Rose Field"

What a cool name.

Here's one version of the family crest:



I picture a new Roosevelt Caucus, mascot is a blue eagle on a white background w/ a green trim, clutching three red roses--two in the left claw (represents FDR and Eleanor), one in the right (represents Teddy).

to honor the Roosevelt Wing of the Democratic Party

here's a link to the jpeg, if anyone wants it

Please redirect discussion to:

Olympus Isn't All About Thunder - Time to Settle on a Name and Move On