How dangerous people get their weapons in America
PHILIP COOK, THE CONVERSATION & Salon
https://www.salon.com/2017/10/04/how-dangerous-people-get-their-weapons-in-america_partner/
SNIP............
The importance of the informal (undocumented) market in supplying criminals is suggested by the results of inmate surveys and data gleaned from guns confiscated by the police. A national survey of inmates of state prisons found that just 10 percent of youthful (age 18-40) male respondents who admitted to having a gun at the time of their arrest had obtained it from a gun store. The other 90 percent obtained them through a variety of off-the-book means: for example, as gifts or sharing arrangements with fellow gang members.
Similarly, an ongoing study of how Chicago gang members get their guns has found that only a trivial percentage obtained them by direct purchase from a store. To the extent that gun dealers are implicated in supplying dangerous people, it is more so by accommodating straw purchasers and traffickers than in selling directly to customers they know to be disqualified.
The supply chain of guns to crime
While criminals typically do not buy their guns at a store, all but a tiny fraction of those in circulation in the United States are first sold at retail by a gun dealer including the guns that eventually end up in the hands of criminals.
That first retail sale was most likely legal, in that the clerk followed federal and state requirements for documentation, a background check and record-keeping. While there are scofflaw dealers who sometimes make under-the-counter deals, that is by no means the norm.
...........SNIP
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Retailers do supply guns directly to dangerous people
I believe sandy hook weapons were retail and registered , Dylan Roof shot 7 people at a church with a retail gun etc
billh58
(6,642 posts)"legal" and ethical. Gun laws need to be made more stringent and selective, and focus on deeper background information and reasons for purchase. Keeping guns out of the hands of social misfits should be the goal.
SCOTUS has already recognized that "infringement" and regulation is allowable, just as it is with other enumerated rights.