to clarify a post of mine so I answered the two questions they had with links and a short description of the topic. Two links. Was this what you were talking about?

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219104918#post8

Respince #8

Not including the Ralph Nader there were 14 other titles each with links not related to Ralph Nader.

It's a shame some folks don't realize that clicking on links are poses some risk

I NEVER open links that are posted. Once was enough for me. I learned my lesson.

with written words that I can read or skim through - not videos that I have to watch/listen to. Some do have videos, but they are within the article. I can read faster than I can listen, so it takes less time to read/skim an article than to watch a video of someone talking about the same information.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219101591

and then to post links to 3 or 4 other unrelated articles (but about Minnesota or some part of Minnesota) that I saw that were interesting that I think my fellow Minnesotans might be interested in, but I don't have the time to post a full blown post about each one. But I would introduce those links with some little introductory sentence about what those links are so people don't confuse them as relating to the main article at the top of the post.

Or post those links as a reply to my OP as "I also found these Minnesota articles to be of special interest" as well.

I would also date the links too, unlike the links in the link that post#6 refers to (also just below) where some appear to be quite old
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219101591

While it's unusual, it is far far below the offensiveness of many many posts I see around.