History of Feminism
Related: About this forumTwitter fails to remove 100 abusive misogynists
Research has shown that nearly half of the accounts flagged over graphic sexist abuse sent to women including the Nobel laureate Malala Yousafzai and the former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton went on to repeat the offence.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a non-profit group, which conducted the research, said that Twitters failure to remove such accounts was enabling and encouraging abusers to spew hate again.
(Snip)
After reporting the accounts that posted abuse to these women, the CCDH noted that 253 of these accounts had still not been removed two months later.
...
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cf870e30-73d6-11ec-aacf-0736e08b15cd?
I'm sure no one in this group thinks this only applies to Twitter. Reddit is probably the worst of them all. But in reality, none actually considers words like 'b*tch' and 'c*nt' to be hate speech.
Women are the only oppressed group for which hateful slurs are still widely considered to be socially acceptable. Anyone is free to use them and defend their use.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)any "social media". It would please me greatly if they'd all just go away. I don't include DU in that category, of course.
And no, I don't find ANY abuse to be "socially acceptable". I definitely support your
original op here.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)whatever value there is is so minimal compared to the maximal filth, its not redeeming at all.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Whether you want to include it or not - it fits the basic definition of social media.
It's a heavily moderated, though for likeminded content. A place like Twitter is not heavily moderated (for good or bad).
redqueen
(115,173 posts)Large social media companies don't want to pay to train, support, and retain enough people to do the job.
spooky3
(36,554 posts)redqueen
(115,173 posts)Every once and a while I get an urge to stop by - mostly still feel too stifled by the rules here to stick around.
bullwinkle428
(20,644 posts)on Twitter, along with the comment that she'd prefer to get the kind of hate mail that her male colleagues are typically subject to.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Nobel Laureates getting hate speech
.for??
Being too intelligent I guess? Being too intelligent and being a woman?
Yes, ofc. But also because The Hate is for any woman daring to be recognized as being more intelligent than the men in their basements who have nothing better to do than to prove their subfloor intelligence on the Twitter machine that permits them the delusion of these ridiculous texts
not even real writing
being meaningful.
Thanks for nothing Twitter.
orleans
(35,400 posts)a few also had porn videos on their twitter feed
twitter banished a couple, but most were left to continue doing what they were doing (including with their porn crap) (ugh!)
redqueen
(115,173 posts)It is so widespread and has poisoned so many minds that there are boards filled with young men talking about how damaging and addictive it is, and many young women are leaning towards radical feminism as a reaction to their experiences with porn sick men, and I am so, so very happy about that. So, bright side
wryter2000
(47,640 posts)And people were posting his columns here. And people were defending Andrew Cuomo here, even suggesting that his accusers were part of a plot.
ShazzieB
(19,041 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 16, 2022, 04:19 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, though. Does someone defending Cuomo and/or using the c word here somehow have some bearing on whether Twitter should get a pass for allowing misogynist content to stand? Because I certainly don't think so.
I will continue this comment in a separate reply, for reasons that will be explained. Watch this space.
ShazzieB
(19,041 posts)I would personally be very pleased to see misogynistic slurs like the c word and the one that is used by dog breeders to refer to the female of that species be banned at DU as I don't think they serve any legitimate purpose here.
I'm putting this in a separate comment, because I voiced a similar entiment here once before and got "rewarded" by having my post hidden for "interfering with forum moderation." If someone alerts on this comment and it gets hidden, hopefully the previous one will be allowed to remain.
redqueen
(115,173 posts)Misogyny is everywhere.
wryter2000
(47,640 posts)And get no reply
redqueen
(115,173 posts)Went through this multiple times back in the day. Until society changes, it won't change. Most people on the left are ok with hate speech against women.
Have said it before but misogyny is just as commonplace on the left as the right, the only difference is where they want to place the boot on our necks. The right considers us private property, the left, public. The right wants to control our bodies with removal of bodily autonomy. The left wants to maintain the social acceptance of sexual objectification and commodification of female bodies (I say 'female' and not 'women's' because it's also targeted at preteens - e.g. 'barely legal' porn)
ShazzieB
(19,041 posts)I didn't realize it till I started writing the above post, but I'm still salty af about that hide. I had to word that comment very carefully because the saltiness kept trying to come through.
wryter2000
(47,640 posts)And I put this here so the defenders see their words were no better than the misogyny on Twitter.
redqueen
(115,173 posts)I missed it at the time. She apparently uses a homophobic slur freely, and when confronted about it she said something along the lines of as long as y'all are using the B word like you own it I will continue and not care about anyone complaining. She's a weird one but she has a good point here.
wryter2000
(47,640 posts)I wouldn't have done it that way. But I did point out the similarity to the N word. People still fought me. One excused the use of the C word by pointing out the rude one is a good writer. I still half tune him out when he's on Stephanie Miller's show.
He has stopped using it, though.
redqueen
(115,173 posts)If these people actually cared about the welfare of women, they'd come correct and speak openly and loudly.
They grudgingly give up this stuff. Which says all we need to know
ShazzieB
(19,041 posts)Thanks for clarifying.
whathehell
(29,911 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 16, 2022, 12:18 AM - Edit history (1)
according to Katha Politt, feminist writer and contributor to The Nation.
ShazzieB
(19,041 posts)whathehell
(29,911 posts)You can see it here on DU, at times.
ShazzieB
(19,041 posts)Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.
redqueen
(115,173 posts)wryter2000
(47,640 posts)But I totally agree.
redqueen
(115,173 posts)or old people, so