History of Feminism

eridani

(51,907 posts) Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:45 AM Sep 2015

The War Against Women: College Campuses and American Culture

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/32308-the-war-against-women-college-campuses-and-american-culture

Unsurprisingly, some of the worst offenders are boys clubs: military, police, fraternities, etc. These entities are professional generators of sexist attitudes and violent behavior towards women.

In the military, we used to refer to female marines as "WMs," or "Walking Mattresses." Our drill instructors and infantry training gurus used to call women "cunts," "skirts," and "cum dumpsters." Hence, we shouldn't be surprised that over 1/5th of female veterans report military sexual trauma(MST). Much like women on college campuses, female veterans vastly underreport their traumatic experiences.

The story is similar for female police officers in the U.S. For example, "In Miami Beach, at least 16 police officers — including two former high-ranking officials — are under investigation for hundreds of racist, pornographic and offensive emails spent between 2010 and 2012." The lewd and disturbing emails were described as "juvenile behavior" by state attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle, who describes a "locker room mentality" in the police force, fomented by former Miami Beach police chief Raymond Martinez.

Again, none of this is new. Back in 1993, the "Los Angeles Times" reported that Gary Herron, a self-defense instructor for female police officers in Orange County, turned in a video tape of a stripper performing "at an Orange County sheriff's training facility" to the television program "A Current Affair."

According to the "Los Angeles Times," Herron "grew increasingly concerned about what the two-year-old videotape showed after hearing stories from women in his classes who said they had been abused and raped, and also about the Irvine Police Department investigation into an alleged sex club formed by officers there."

Again, university fraternities are no different. Jessica Valenti, writing for the "Guardian," notes that, "These are not anomalies or bad apples: numerous studies have found that men who join fraternities are three times more likely to rape, that women in sororities are 74 percent more likely to experience rape than other college women, and that one in five women will be sexually assaulted in four years away at school."

Clearly, institutions that are male-dominated and created within a culture based on male-dominance will produce dreadful, often deadly results for women.

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The War Against Women: College Campuses and American Culture (Original Post) eridani Sep 2015 OP

The Laws Targeting Campus Rape Culture eridani Sep 2015 #1

eridani

(51,907 posts)

1. The Laws Targeting Campus Rape Culture

Reply to eridani (Original post)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 09:53 PM

Sep 2015

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/32370-the-laws-targeting-campus-rape-culture

Campus SaVE’s stipulations go beyond what was outlined in similar federal guidelines issued by the Department of Education in 2011: Rather than recommending that colleges develop educational programming, the law explicitly requires all schools to offer “primary prevention and awareness programs” that reduce the risk of sexual assault. The idea is that all students and faculty members should be held accountable for the elimination of sexual violence on campus. In these programs, participants learn what’s defined as consent, for example, and how to recognize signs of abusive behavior. It also stipulates some minimum standards in campus judicial proceedings (for both the defendant and the accused) and mandates that institutions specify the number of dating- and sexual-violence claims filed in their annual crime reports.

“[The act] highlights dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking. These are crimes that we know are happening on our college and university campuses. So it requires colleges to actually have specific policies, protocols, and responses,” Allison Kiss, the executive director of the Clery Center for Security on Campus, told me.

What’s particularly novel about Campus SaVE’s education requirements—and what many groups, including The White House’s It’s On Us campaign, tout as the key strategy—is its inclusion of bystander-intervention, the model that emphasizes the responsibility of those standing witness to potentially problematic situations to interrupt in whatever way possible. “Bystander intervention is so natural for this population because when sexual assaults happen on campus they’re typically student on student,” Kiss said. “And they’re happening when administrators aren’t around.”

Traditionally, schools across the country have invested astonishingly disparate amounts of resources in sexual-assault awareness and prevention. Some schools, like Moraine Park Technical College, for example, are launching programs for the first time this year, while others, like the University of Texas, already had Campus SaVE-esque policies prior to its passage. It seems that few institutions, however, fall into the latter category, according to Know Your IX policy coordinator Alyssa Peterson, who noted that the government has never really had a streamlined way to comprehensively track schools’ sexual-assault programs. A major goal of Campus SaVE was to implement minimum standards to make policies more uniform nationwide and ensure that more people on more campuses gain exposure to the complexities of the sexual-assault problem and the most effective means to address it.

But no act of Congress is going to be a cure-all to higher education’s sexual-assault problem. From devising programs and approaches that adequately educate and prepare students to balancing fairness in campus judicial proceedings, there are many strides to be made and questions left to be answered.

Reply to this discussion