Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts) Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:53 PM Feb 2014

500 Years of Female Portraits in Western Art

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

500 Years of Female Portraits in Western Art (Original Post) Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 OP

That was lovely. madaboutharry Feb 2014 #1

You are very welcome. Glad you enjoyed it. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #2

Beautiful ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #3

yw Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #4

Thanks. (n/t) spin Feb 2014 #5

Lovely -- thanks for posting. theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #6

madaboutharry

(41,418 posts)

1. That was lovely.

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 01:05 PM

Feb 2014

Thanks for posting.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

2. You are very welcome. Glad you enjoyed it.

Reply to madaboutharry (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 01:07 PM

Feb 2014

ismnotwasm

(42,486 posts)

3. Beautiful

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 02:38 PM

Feb 2014

Thank you

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

4. yw

Reply to ismnotwasm (Reply #3)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 02:38 PM

Feb 2014

spin

(17,493 posts)

5. Thanks. (n/t)

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 06:55 PM

Feb 2014

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)

6. Lovely -- thanks for posting.

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 08:30 PM

Feb 2014

Now those are the kinds of pictures of women I'd love to see more of on DU. Also more works by women artists. I'm especially fond of some of the women who created fabulous works during the deco era, like Tamara de Lempicka.

Reply to this discussion