Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Occupy Underground
Related: About this forumOccupy the regulatory system!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/occupy-the-regulatory-system/2012/04/27/gIQAjo21lT_blog.html?uuid=S1BVdJCBEeGDF7xV6P3Uog
NEW YORK Occupy Wall Street has moved. Its new address: 60 Wall Street.
There, inside a soaring public atrium, dreadlocked teens trade shoulder massages near the evening meditation circle. A young man holds up a sign: Youre a Federal Reserve $lave. The dinnertime crowd buzzes over free plates of rice and beans while listening to an improvised, profanity-laden operetta about the evils of agro-giant Monsanto. But amid the din, theres a small group holding a quieter, and far wonkier, conversation.
What are the restrictions? Does it let anyone call themselves a clearing agency? It seems like theres a rigorous definition, but maybe theres not, Caitlin Kline says. What if all youre taking on is counterparty risk for all of these banks, but you dont ever take any other exposure? It seems to be covered by several exemptions.
Kline, a former Wall Street trader-turned-Occupier, is a member of Occupy the SEC, an offshoot of the large movement that has burrowed deep into the regulatory process. At this moment, shes trying to figure out if the drafting of the Volcker Rule a provision of President Obamas Wall Street overhaul that would restrict commercial banks from making speculative investments that do not benefit their customers is tight enough to keep banks in check.
After much discussion, the group agreed that the Volcker Rules earlier definition of clearing agencies, which banks use for exchanging futures contracts, was clear and tough and good, but decided that it was worth double-checking section 17(a) of questions that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission raised about it.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Occupy the regulatory system! (Original Post)
xchrom
Apr 2012
OP
patrice
(47,992 posts)1. Thanks for this.
joshcryer
(62,507 posts)2. Word.
Guerrilla23
(18 posts)3. Now you are talking
Now you are talking.
We need a new "Manifesto". Right on!