Occupy Underground

scottie55

(1,400 posts) Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:48 PM Apr 2016

Who Purged All The Voters In New York?

I haven't heard why so many people were taken off the rolls, and not allowed to vote.

Anyone know what actually happened?

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who Purged All The Voters In New York? (Original Post) scottie55 Apr 2016 OP

They are performing an 'audit' and doing a 'review'. Therefore, under these circumstances ViseGrip Apr 2016 #1

Sounds good to me. Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #2

Sounds good, but we all know it won't change a thing for this election. Conveniently. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #6

I Am Not Trying To Make A Point (This Time) scottie55 Apr 2016 #3

You have every right to be suspicious. Too much has happened in this primary. desmiller Apr 2016 #4

As I predicted... Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #5

you did call it kip questionseverything Apr 2016 #7

Yeah, I saw that... 70 vote discrepancy favoring Hillary on one machine audit. I have paid Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #8

THIS is where we need Anonymous to hack into DNC and Podesta group servers FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #9

^This. K&R nt TBF May 2016 #11

Who indeed. It's no mystery: stopbush Apr 2016 #10

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)

1. They are performing an 'audit' and doing a 'review'. Therefore, under these circumstances

Reply to scottie55 (Original post)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:52 PM

Apr 2016

no delegates should be awarded to either. If an audit or review still means they cannot fix this, make it right, as in there cannot be a re-vote? Then the next course of action would be to nullify the results and campaigners move on, lessons learned by the cheaters, or split the delegates evenly. With what is already known, no delegates should be awarded without a resolution. The results are not real. They should be chucked!

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)

2. Sounds good to me.

Reply to ViseGrip (Reply #1)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:54 PM

Apr 2016

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)

6. Sounds good, but we all know it won't change a thing for this election. Conveniently. nt

Reply to Ed Suspicious (Reply #2)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:05 PM

Apr 2016

scottie55

(1,400 posts)

3. I Am Not Trying To Make A Point (This Time)

Reply to scottie55 (Original post)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:54 PM

Apr 2016

I just haven't read what really happened and was wondering if anyone knew.

I have my suspicions.....

desmiller

(747 posts)

4. You have every right to be suspicious. Too much has happened in this primary.

Reply to scottie55 (Reply #3)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:58 PM

Apr 2016

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)

5. As I predicted...

Reply to scottie55 (Reply #3)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:03 PM

Apr 2016

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280178724

questionseverything

(10,298 posts)

7. you did call it kip

Reply to Kip Humphrey (Reply #5)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:12 PM

Apr 2016

have you seen this?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511800403

the illinois ballot integrity project says they have proof of the audit being fixed in chicago

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)

8. Yeah, I saw that... 70 vote discrepancy favoring Hillary on one machine audit. I have paid

Reply to questionseverything (Reply #7)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:18 PM

Apr 2016

attention to much vote rigging, voter suppression, and election stealing by the republicons since 2000.

I have seen more of this in this Democratic primary than in all that republicon thievery. It is disgusting and I am sooooo done with the DNC.

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)

9. THIS is where we need Anonymous to hack into DNC and Podesta group servers

Reply to scottie55 (Original post)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:03 PM

Apr 2016

and blow the lid off the conspiracy to commit fraud.

TBF

(34,748 posts)

11. ^This. K&R nt

Reply to FlatBaroque (Reply #9)

Sun May 1, 2016, 09:13 AM

May 2016

stopbush

(24,632 posts)

10. Who indeed. It's no mystery:

Reply to scottie55 (Original post)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:11 PM

Apr 2016

It certainly looks suspicious that more than 125,000 Democrats were dropped from Brooklyn's voter rolls between last November and Tuesday's primary. New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer said that the Board of Elections confirmed the voters were removed and that his office would conduct an audit to see if anything improper was done.

But Michael Ryan, executive director of the elections board, denied anyone was disenfranchised. While more than 100,000 voters were taken off the rolls, he told the New York Times, 63,000 were added and the decline did not "shock his conscience." He told WNYC that "people die every day and they come off the list," and New Yorkers move a lot — another reason they might be taken off the rolls.

Indeed, there might very well be a good — and legitimate — explanation for why all those names were removed.

http://www.npr.org/2016/04/20/474990269/why-voters-are-removed-from-the-rolls-explained?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160420

Reply to this discussion