Religion
Related: About this forumA "Snaketivity" Display in the Illinois Capitol is Still Angering Conservatives
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2018/12/18/a-snaketivity-display-in-the-illinois-capitol-is-still-angering-conservatives/
A Snaketivity Display in the Illinois Capitol is Still Angering Conservatives
By Hemant Mehta, December 18, 2018
The Satanic display in the Illinois Capitol cant catch a break. The display, which says Knowledge is the Greatest Gift and features a womans hand holding an apple while a snake surrounds it, is infuriating Christians who cant believe they have to share public space with an idea that makes them uncomfortable.
As we noted earlier, Republican State Sen. Paul Schimpf sent a letter to the secretary of state demanding the removal of the Snaketivity.
Now we know hes not alone.
Over the weekend, a Pennsylvania-based Catholic group called the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property held a protest against the display outside the Capitol.No government entity should promote the father of lies, as this is contrary to the good they are called to uphold in society, Preston Noell, with the societys Chicago chapter, said Sunday. These public Satanic offenses are a direct mockery of Christs nativity and these attacks must be met with opposition, which we are adhering to with prayer.
Noell said the Satanic display was one of several attempts to shut down Christians and attack Christian civilization.
We are a Christian nation, Noell said. We believe in our Lord Jesus Christ and to equate Satanism with anything that is religious like this is an affront to reason.
Just to be clear, this Catholic is angry about a display that celebrates knowledge because he thinks it mocks his faith. Hes really just proving their point In any case, its not an attempt to shut down Christians, because the Satanists made it clear they just wanted the same treatment afforded to other religious groups. Not special rights. Equal rights.
And its hard to believe this group really cares about whats good in society when the Catholic Church in Pennsylvania was the subject of the grand jury report listing hundreds of abusive priests and more than a thousand victims.
underpants
(187,425 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)whathehell
(29,875 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Mariana
(15,206 posts)No, they are not. Preston Noell is lying outright about that. In this story, only Christians want to shut down opposing ideas.
whathehell
(29,875 posts)and Mr. Noell may be lying, but the whole story is bizarre.
Mariana
(15,206 posts)Similar stories come up just about every year. Christmas display goes up on public property, usually but not always a nativity scene. Non-Christian display also goes up on public property. Christians are offended and try to get non-Christian display banned, and/or they vandalize it.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vandals-attack-satanic-pentagram-erected-as-atheist-protest-to-nativity-scene-florida/
https://www.wlwt.com/article/banner-at-controversial-indiana-nativity-vandalized/3561159
https://ffrf.org/news/news-releases/item/28721-ffrf-claims-victory-in-connecticut-censorship-suit
https://dailyvoice.com/connecticut/ridgefield/news/reward-offered-after-vandals-slash-winter-solstice-banner-in-shelton/694619/
http://www.myballard.com/2017/12/14/menorah-vandalized-at-bergen-place-park/
whathehell
(29,875 posts)I'm a firm believer in the separation of church and state. That said, I don't think a "satanist" display is the best way tomake that point. To each his own.
Mariana
(15,206 posts)The lawsuits concerning government promotion of one particular religion normally don't end up with a ban on religious displays on public property. They usually get a ruling that if the religious Christmas displays are permitted on public property, then others must be permitted as well.
The Satanic Temple is a non-theistic organization. Have you seen a picture of the Satanic Temple's sculpture? It isn't obscene or profane. There isn't anything objectively offensive about it.
whathehell
(29,875 posts)I have no suggestions. In addition, I have no interest in pursuing the subject further, as I don't see it as one of our more pressing national issues.
If you feel otherwise, please feel free to find others who share that view, as I am no longer "on board" if you will. Enjoy your evening.
Mariana
(15,206 posts)What a surprise.
I shall enjoy my evening, thank you.
Cartoonist
(7,558 posts)Tell me about it, Padre.
whathehell
(29,875 posts)Tell us about it, Mr. Cifer.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)10 points to Gryffindor.
whathehell
(29,875 posts)Lou Cipher.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)And has anyone else noticed the Trump Store ad on the Friendly Atheist site?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)But then again website owners don't generally have control over that. Google (or whoever the ad sponsor is) displays the ads that target you based on your browsing history, etc.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Although I can't imagine what that might be, that it happened is cause for concern.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Trump Store is probably paying extra for more exposure. Desperate to scam the suckers while they can.
Major Nikon
(36,911 posts)-- anonymous