Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is there little to no discussions about the KC Chiefs non-performance yesterday? Very curious. n/t (Original Post) SheilaAnn Monday OP
Nothing to discuss calguy Monday #1
It wasn't meaningless to Cincinnati and Miami but chicoescuela Monday #8
Had those Rebl2 Tuesday #17
absolutely true chicoescuela Tuesday #20
I can understand that snowybirdie Monday #2
My response to the Chief's debacle is that without Kelce and Mahomes, they "got nuthin." n/t SheilaAnn Monday #3
No ..the goal is to win the Superbowl... JT45242 Monday #7
Yes, but wouldn't we have been upset if Mahomes had been injured in a meaningless game And couldn't play in the playoffs Walleye Monday #10
He has Rebl2 Tuesday #18
It seems that second-guessing is the national pastime now Walleye Tuesday #22
The goal is to win the superbowl. MotownPgh Monday #12
Yes, of course. snowybirdie Monday #13
I know that you understand the NFL MotownPgh Monday #16
Maga morality has invaded every aspect of our lives Walleye Tuesday #23
Doesn't That Presume, However... ProfessorGAC Wednesday #24
The Chiefs had already clinched a bye True Dough Monday #4
Thank you for your response, I guess that does make sense...I guess. Was hoping the QB was going to show his stuff. LOL. SheilaAnn Monday #5
Ive been in Arrowhead, watching my Hawks, i was visiting kozar Monday #9
And the B-team defense couldn't stop a sneeze.... lastlib Monday #11
I maybe Rebl2 Tuesday #19
Broncos had to win to make the playoffs, now they're in after beating the Chief's reserves. sop Monday #6
Simple! gay texan Monday #14
3 games, 11 days.... starters took time off to a well deserved rest. LizBeth Monday #15
Absolutely Rebl2 Tuesday #21

calguy

(5,798 posts)
1. Nothing to discuss
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 08:34 AM
Monday

The Chiefs, in a meaningless game, decided to rest their players and protect them from injury going into the playoffs.

chicoescuela

(1,712 posts)
8. It wasn't meaningless to Cincinnati and Miami but
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 09:14 AM
Monday

those two teams put themselves in a position where they had to get help from a team that wasn’t going to provide any

snowybirdie

(5,745 posts)
2. I can understand that
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 08:44 AM
Monday

However, isn't the point of sports to try and do the best you can for every game no matter what? That's what we teach kids anyway. But the millionaires need their rest and need to be coddled, don't they?

SheilaAnn

(10,250 posts)
3. My response to the Chief's debacle is that without Kelce and Mahomes, they "got nuthin." n/t
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 08:46 AM
Monday

JT45242

(3,015 posts)
7. No ..the goal is to win the Superbowl...
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 08:52 AM
Monday

Every game from here on out is "must win" because the NFL is one and done playoffs.

This is the same as the Sunday afternoon game that MLB teams routinely rest mist of their starters (ever wonder why no hitters are more common now and they occur on day games after night games at higher rates, especially on Sundays ).

This is the result of one and done playoffs...think of it as load management for football, which literally only occurs on the last game of a 17 game season. You don't notice it in 82 NBA games or 162 MLB games.

Walleye

(36,714 posts)
10. Yes, but wouldn't we have been upset if Mahomes had been injured in a meaningless game And couldn't play in the playoffs
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 09:40 AM
Monday

Rebl2

(15,103 posts)
18. He has
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 11:06 AM
Tuesday

an injury to his ankle. If he has a chance to rest that ankle you take it. Pacheco finally got back after early injury in the season only to be injured again Christmas Day game.

MotownPgh

(397 posts)
12. The goal is to win the superbowl.
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 10:37 AM
Monday

To lose a key player to injury can obliterate a team's chances. This is high stakes chess, not checkers, and getting out with as few injuries as possible is the goal for all playoff teams.

snowybirdie

(5,745 posts)
13. Yes, of course.
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 10:55 AM
Monday

My point is sports itself has been taken over by moneyed interest and that will not change. But I remember a time when I talked my son in Little League into going to a game against the undefeated team when his team hadn't won at all. He went for the "sportsmanship" of it. It was the moral thing to do. Sports is now big business. I understand that. Its just sad for me.

MotownPgh

(397 posts)
16. I know that you understand the NFL
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 11:37 AM
Monday

is a business. I try to look at it as their profession, and that's why they get great salaries. I look forward to the playoffs to see the best of the best go at it. There were also some really great games yesterday because the playoffs were still up for grabs for some teams yesterday! Just not KC.

Walleye

(36,714 posts)
23. Maga morality has invaded every aspect of our lives
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 11:45 AM
Tuesday

One of their beliefs is, if it makes money, it must be OK

ProfessorGAC

(70,942 posts)
24. Doesn't That Presume, However...
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:20 PM
Wednesday

...that the players themselves weren't playing their hardest?
Were reserves overmatched by a playoff team that had motivation to win? Sure looks it.
But, the players who were out there didn't lay down. They are reserves for a reason. The starters are better.

True Dough

(21,203 posts)
4. The Chiefs had already clinched a bye
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 08:46 AM
Monday

They were playing their "B" team and on cruise control. No sense in risking injuries to key starters in what was a meaningless game for them.

If they perform like that in two weeks when they meet their divisional round opponent, believe me, there will be non-stop talk about it at that time! But that's highly unlikely.

SheilaAnn

(10,250 posts)
5. Thank you for your response, I guess that does make sense...I guess. Was hoping the QB was going to show his stuff. LOL.
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 08:48 AM
Monday

kozar

(2,948 posts)
9. Ive been in Arrowhead, watching my Hawks, i was visiting
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 09:15 AM
Monday

That's a loud stadium, of course I hate the arm chop

lastlib

(25,048 posts)
11. And the B-team defense couldn't stop a sneeze....
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 10:03 AM
Monday

As a Chiefs fan, I was embarrassed as hell. I'd thank God for Chris Jones and Trent McDuffie if I actually believed in a god.

sop

(11,862 posts)
6. Broncos had to win to make the playoffs, now they're in after beating the Chief's reserves.
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 08:51 AM
Monday

Denver could be one of the teams Kansas City might see in the playoffs. Maybe the Chiefs would prefer to face Denver again in the playoffs than another team?

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»Why is there little to no...