Automobile Enthusiasts
Related: About this forumA car with no front or back that has no steering wheel: What San Francisco's next robotaxis could look like
The toaster box-shaped robotaxi that pulls into a parking space outside a waterfront office park in Foster City resembles a carriage more than a conventional car.
The vehicle is symmetrical and almost half the width of a sport utility vehicle, but taller than a typical sedan. It has no steering wheel or pedals. There are no front seats. Or back seats. Rather, the driverless car manufactured by Amazons Zoox features inward-facing chairs, similar to taxicabs in London, for four passengers. Sliding doors opened by touch screens provide entry to the unique chariot.
On a 2-mile loop of quiet public roads, the Zoox robotaxi drives at speeds of up to 35 mph (its designed to drive up to 75 mph), making a left turn tighter than a regular car at a stop-light intersection before pulling into another parking spot.
On the way back, the robotaxi doesnt have to make a three-point turn to back out of its parking space. Because its bidirectional, what was considered its rear now becomes the robotaxis front and it simply drives out of the lot.
Link: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/sf-robotaxis-zoox-amazon-19549968.php
"Be sure to check all personal belongings before exiting the ride."
global1
(25,959 posts)Tadpole Raisin
(1,561 posts)car that my family had when I was a kid, brought over from Germany or Switzerland (the car not me).
Remember the Isetta? It felt like you were sitting in an egg that doubled as a spaceship, at least from my kid eyes.
Sorry, I tried to link a photo but I couldnt figure it out.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,626 posts)right click on it and click on "Open image in new tab" or similar (I have a Mac and that's what mine says).
When it opens, look at the URL at the top. If it ends in .jpg or .png, copy and paste the entire URL to the body of your response here in the thread. Hit "Preview" to make sure it will show up. If it does, hit Post or Update.
If it is an image on your computer, you are going to have to use an image hosting site like postimages.org
birdographer
(2,528 posts)Martin68
(24,726 posts)it's a driverless car? If so, there's no reason this one should be more dangerous than any other one. Seems like a rather logical concept to me. What's your major concern?
birdographer
(2,528 posts)Martin68
(24,726 posts)birdographer
(2,528 posts)There are too many to choose from, but here is an interesting article. A box pops up saying to sign in or create an account. X it out and you should be able to continue reading; at least I was. Maybe it only lets clueless old fogies like me in. If you are wary of clicking on a random link from an old fogey, go to the site and search for the topic, it should come up. Or go buy a Tesla. Keep calling people who use critical thinking old fogeys. You do you.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/self-driving-cars-2662494269
Martin68
(24,726 posts)consistently right at first, but it will in the end, and then it will be standard. I've lived ling enough to see that happen over and over again. I'm not going to buy a Tesla but I have a friend who has driven me on a few long trips in one, and they have some great advantages over gas-powered vehicles. I watched Tesla's autopilot in action, and it worked magnificently.
I admire your tenacity, but in my experience it's a losing proposition to discount innovations in the early stages of development. Scientists insisted that heavier-than-air flight was impossible, Albert Einstein was quoted in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as saying, There is not the slightest indication that [nuclear energy] will ever be obtainable," "The ordinary horseless carriage is at present a luxury for the wealthy; and although its price will probably fall in the future, it will never, of course, come into as common use as the bicycle, claimed the Literary Digest in 1899," no man-made object could ever break the sound barrier, the concepts of television and personal computers were pooh-poohed by "critical thinkers," too.
Polybius
(18,354 posts)There were some that said CRT TV's would never be obsolete.
Martin68
(24,726 posts)and he wasn't going to make another transition. When he died at the age of 92, he had hundreds of CDs. For decades my parents refused to buy a touch-tone phone because they loved their old Ma Bell Bakelite rotary phone. I begged them to get a touch-tone phone so I could handle menus for flight information when I was visiting them from overseas, but no dice.Years later they got one, but continued to use the rotary phone. I've still got that phone.
Old Crank
(4,889 posts)And we seem to accept the CARnage of 40k plus dead per year. We allow masdive wall front ends on half the vehicles sold in the US knowing that they kill pedestrians and cyclists. We allow vehicles to let drivers break the speed limits with impunity and hen they main and kill rarely are there serious consequences.I
dickthegrouch
(3,586 posts)IIRC their Waymo cars hit the same towed truck twice because it was presenting its front to the vehicle behind instead of its rear.
Their first reaction? It was the tow truck drivers fault for hooking the vehicle up incorrectly!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/02/14/waymo-driverless-cars-google-software-update-crashes/