True Crime
Related: About this forumCalifornia Supreme Court overturns Scott Peterson death sentence
The Hill
ZACK BUDRYK - 08/24/20 03:54 PM EDT
The court upheld Petersons 2004 murder conviction, rejecting his argument that media coverage prevented him from receiving a fair trial. However, it found clear and significant errors in jury selection during the penalty phase on the part of the trial judge, according to The Associated Press.
Peterson contends his trial was flawed for multiple reasons, beginning with the unusual amount of pretrial publicity that surrounded the case," the court said. We reject Petersons claim that he received an unfair trial as to guilt and thus affirm his convictions for murder. However, the judge made a series of clear and significant errors in jury selection that, under long-standing United States Supreme Court precedent, undermined Petersons right to an impartial jury at the penalty phase, the court ruled
Attorneys for Peterson had argued the judge wrongly dismissed prospective jurors who said they were personally opposed to the death penalty but would follow the law and levy a death sentence.
Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/513417-california-supreme-court-overturns-scott-peterson-death-sentence
Background
Apart from her husband Scott, the last two people known to have spoken to Laci before she disappeared were her half-sister, Amy Rocha, and her mother, Sharon.[15]
On December 23, 2002 at 5:45pm, Laci and Scott went to Amy's workplace, Salon Salon, where Amy cut Scott's hair as she did each month.[16] As they spoke, Amy said Scott offered to pick up a fruit basket that she had ordered for her grandfather as the Christmas gift the next day because he would be playing golf at a course nearby. Prosecutors say Scott also told other people he would play golf on the day of Christmas Eve.[16][17] Her mother Sharon spoke with Laci on the telephone around 8:30pm that evening.[18]
Scott later told police that he last saw his wife about 9:30am on December 24, when he left to go fishing at the Berkeley Marina. He said Laci was watching a cooking television show, preparing to mop the floor, bake cookies, and walk the family dog to a nearby park.[19][20][21] At the time of her disappearance, Laci was eight-and-a-half months pregnant.[22] The next morning Karen Servas (a neighbor of the Petersons) stated that around 10:30am [23] she found the Petersons' dog, a golden retriever named McKenzie, and returned him to the Petersons' back yard. Another neighbor named Mike Chiavetta said he saw McKenzie at about 10:45am as he played catch with his own dog.[24] The Modesto Bee also reported an unnamed female neighbor who found the dog with muddy leash, wandering in the neighborhood. That neighbor put the dog in the Petersons' yard, not observing anything was out of place.[25] Scott said he returned home that afternoon to find it empty.[19] Scott told Laci's mother that he found McKenzie in their back yard, though she related in her book that he later denied this.[26] Laci's 1996 Land Rover Discovery SE was in the driveway.[27] He showered and washed his clothes because he said he got wet from fishing.[19]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Laci_Peterson
aquamarina
(1,865 posts)drmeow
(5,330 posts)The death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment but life in prison without parole is not. I'm against the death penalty for a lot of reasons but in a situation where the person is clearly and unambiguously guilty, except for pain associated with the execution itself, the sentence seems more a punishment of the family and people who love/care about the prisoner than of the prisoner. Life in prison without parole seems to me to cause more suffering to the prisoner.
I do have a somewhat unusual view of death so that is part of it
aquamarina
(1,865 posts)and the physical pain of death. I also think that as long as you are not dead, there is always a scintilla of hope that you can one day get out. But you are right, life in prison is probably no picnic.
JenniferJuniper
(4,548 posts)I only have issues with life without parole for those under 18, even 21, when their crimes were committed. Some people just don't belong out and about. I think kids at least deserve a shot at parole.