Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Veterans
Related: About this forumApache Helicopter: Congress Asks Army Why It's Accepting Unfinished AH-64Es
http://defense.aol.com/2013/04/17/apache-helicopter-congress-asks-army-why-its-accepting-unfinis/?icid=trending2One of the Army's first AH-64E Apache Guardian helicopters on training exercises near Fort Lewis, Washington.
Apache Helicopter: Congress Asks Army Why It's Accepting Unfinished AH-64Es
By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
Published: April 17, 2013
CAPITOL HILL: Congress has asked the Army to explain why it has officially taken delivery of at least seven AH-64E Apache Guardian helicopters that don't have transmissions installed yet, AOL Defense has learned. An unidentified subcontractor to Boeing which makes the helicopter, fell behind on building the transmissions and is now trying to catch up, but until it does, the high-tech gunships are unflyable.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) mentioned the Apache transmission issue in one sentence of a 190-page report released last month, as reported by our colleagues at Inside Defense. But the problem remained unfixed as of yesterday, when Hill staff first learned of it during an Army briefing on the service's 2014 budget. Both Congress and AOL Defense are now waiting on further explanation from the Army.
"The question is, are they still behind, (and) why would the Army be taking delivery of aircraft that aren't complete?" one Hill staffer told AOL Defense. "Normally the government doesn't sign for an aircraft that is missing a major component, and the contractor doesn't get paid for it until it's complete.... Boeing obviously needs to get a handle on this."
The staffer did not expect the taxpayer to have to bear any additional costs for the helicopters, since Boeing and its subcontractor should pay to install the belated transmission out of their own pockets. The bigger concern is the delay to an important Army program.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Apache Helicopter: Congress Asks Army Why It's Accepting Unfinished AH-64Es (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Apr 2013
OP
Aristus
(68,632 posts)1. Maybe they were hoping that no one would notice.
If 'delivery' means 'getting paid', no wonder the corporate crooks were fudging things.
Time to yank them off the gravy train until they develop a little competence.
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)2. I'm sure delivery means getting paid
I work for the fed government in a laboratory. We don't pay for any piece of equipment in my department until it is unpacked and running. I don't know why it would/should be any different for any other agency.
A government employee was obviously trying to do someone a favor by paying them prematurely. Whoever it is, should get roasted for this.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)3. 'Cause if Boeing's quarterly numbers didn't meet target the entire economy could've collapsed ....
.... see, they're too big to fail, so we had to bail 'em out.