Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,491 posts)
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 11:30 AM Apr 2013

Military Must Release Bullet-Wound Records

The Department of Defense failed to show that a veteran's FOIA request for records of soldiers who suffered fatal bullet wounds while wearing body armor would "shock" troops' families, a federal judge ruled.
Retired Marine Corps Capt. Roger Charles is investigating whether U.S. troops were provided inadequate body armor. Charles is editor of Soldiers for the Truth Foundation's online journal Defense Watch.
He submitted a FOIA request to the Pentagon's Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in October 2008, seeking records on bullet wounds to armored troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan between January 2006 and December 2007.
The request was directed to then-Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner Capt. Craig T. Mallak.
By January 30, 2009, the institute had not produced any documents nor estimated of when it might respond. He filed a complaint for injunctive relief in February 2009, alleging violations of the Freedom of Information and Administrative Procedure Acts.
He claimed that troops were "being sent into harm's way with substandard ballistic protection from small arms fire," and that the Pentagon had recalled more than 16,000 sets of body armor.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/04/02/56269.htm

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Military Must Release Bullet-Wound Records (Original Post) douglas9 Apr 2013 OP
Hey, body armor's neither as profitable as aircraft carriers and jets. Scuba Apr 2013 #1
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
1. Hey, body armor's neither as profitable as aircraft carriers and jets.
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 11:39 AM
Apr 2013

Remember, the carriers are easy targets and the jets don't fly so why should anyone expect body armor to work?

Besides, there's a growing supply of poverty stricken potential GI's.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Military Must Release Bul...