Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 08:10 AM Feb 2013

Manning's Right to a Speedy Trial Not Violated After 1,000 Days, Judge Rules

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/02/26-7



Pre-trial hearings move to a full court martial trial in June

Manning's Right to a Speedy Trial Not Violated After 1,000 Days, Judge Rules
- Jacob Chamberlain, staff writer
Published on Tuesday, February 26, 2013 by Common Dreams

Bradley Manning has not had his rights violated while waiting in a cell for almost three years before being granted a trial, judge Colonel Denise Lind ruled in a pre-trial hearing Tuesday.

Manning's lawyer, David Coombs, had argued that the prosecution was guilty of "extreme foot-dragging" and "shameful" lack of diligence, which violated Manning's right to a speedy trial—in a final bid that could have had the charges against Manning dismissed.

A soldier in the military has had his or her speedy trial rights violated when it takes over 120 days before an arraignment, Kevin Gosztola reports at FireDogLake, which is the case for Manning. However, Lind ruled in favor of the prosecution who said some of those days didn't actually count in the speedy trial rule, due to “excludable delays” initiated by the prosecution.

The pre-trial hearings will now be certain to move to a full court martial trial in June.

Saturday marked the 1,000th day Manning has been in military custody without trial, and protesters gathered in 70 locations around the world in solidarity with Manning.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manning's Right to a Speedy Trial Not Violated After 1,000 Days, Judge Rules (Original Post) unhappycamper Feb 2013 OP
LOL. In other words there is no such thing as the right to a speedy trial. Smarmie Doofus Feb 2013 #1
120 days is not an absolute qazplm Feb 2013 #2
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
1. LOL. In other words there is no such thing as the right to a speedy trial.
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 08:13 AM
Feb 2013

Sick and getting sicker.

qazplm

(3,626 posts)
2. 120 days is not an absolute
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 09:21 AM
Feb 2013

rule under Rule for Court-Martial 707. It's a presumptive rule but it can be rebutted. Trials often take more than 120 days to go to trial for various reasons. I dont know the specifics of this case well enough to say whether the case should have been dismissed or not.

But generally speaking, the relief for violating the rule is dismissing WITHOUT prejudice to refile.

Article 10 is a different rule that deals with folks in pretrial confinement, and that doesn't have a set number, but the government has to show diligence. That's really the rule that would have been applied in this case.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Manning's Right to a Spee...