Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Veterans
Related: About this forumBloomberg: Flawed F-35 Fighter Too Big to Kill as Lockheed Hooks 45 States
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-02-21/flawed-f-35-fighter-too-big-to-kill-as-lockheed-hooks-45-statesAlmost half a billion dollars 'worth' of F-35s
Flawed F-35 Fighter Too Big to Kill as Lockheed Hooks 45 States
By Kathleen Miller, Tony Capaccio and Danielle Ivory on February 22, 2013
The Pentagon envisioned the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter as an affordable, state-of-the-art stealth jet serving three military branches and U.S. allies.
Instead, the Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT) aircraft has been plagued by a costly redesign, bulkhead cracks, too much weight, and delays to essential software that have helped put it seven years behind schedule and 70 percent over its initial cost estimate. At almost $400 billion, it's the most expensive weapons system in U.S. history.
It is also the defense project too big to kill. The F-35 funnels business to a global network of contractors that includes Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC) and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA of Norway. It counts 1,300 suppliers in 45 states supporting 133,000 jobs -- and more in nine other countries, according to Lockheed. The F-35 is an example of how large weapons programs can plow ahead amid questions about their strategic necessity and their failure to arrive on time and on budget.
"It's got a lot of political protection," said Winslow Wheeler, a director at the Project on Government Oversight's Center for Defense Information in Washington. "In that environment, very, very few members of Congress are willing to say this is an unaffordable dog and we need to get rid of it."
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bloomberg: Flawed F-35 Fighter Too Big to Kill as Lockheed Hooks 45 States (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Feb 2013
OP
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)1. That's how they do it. It's a pretty effective business model.
And it makes me sick.
K/R
dixiegrrrrl
(60,011 posts)5. another type of welfare for the profit making biz...
Wonder how many of those companies are paying any serious taxes?
CrispyQ
(38,585 posts)2. 53¢ of every tax dollar goes to the military.
Next time you hear someone complain about social security benefits for seniors so they don't have to eat cat food, or whine that their taxes are being spent so our kids can have a hot lunch, make them watch this 4 minute video about the military industrial complex.
President Eisenhower warned about the military industrial complex. The MIC currently gets 53¢ of every tax dollar & they want more. Talk about entitlement!
Facebook has removed this video from my page twice.
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)3. I hadn't seen that video.
Thanks!!1!
CrispyQ
(38,585 posts)4. You're welcome.
I think the drawing is fantastic & the message is critical.
The F-35 is too big to kill. The banks are too big to fail. I'm so sick of fraudulent, corrupt institutions & enterprises being too big to do anything about.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)6. Fuck FaceBook! (nt)
Behind Facebook's tax bill
February 22, 2013
http://money.cnn.com/2013/02/22/technology/social/facebook-income-tax/
I know this is one paragraph over the limit, but that last one just had to be included.
February 22, 2013
http://money.cnn.com/2013/02/22/technology/social/facebook-income-tax/
A tax advocacy group says Facebook, which made $1 billion in U.S. profit before taxes last year, will pay no U.S. income tax for 2012.
Tax experts say that could possibly be true -- and if so, it's perfectly legal -- but it's only part of the story. At issue is a sizable tax deduction from stock options that Facebook issued to its employees.
Stock options, like regular cash salaries, are tax-deductible for companies. Companies can use those deductions to offset their profits, and apply those losses to previous years, too. That's how a company could even be eligible for a refund in a year when it made money.
Citizens for Tax Justice, the advocacy group, says Facebook (FB) will receive a tax refund of nearly $430 million as a result of those options.
Facebook said in an e-mail that the company believes "in paying our fair share, and we do pay our fair share."
Tax experts say that could possibly be true -- and if so, it's perfectly legal -- but it's only part of the story. At issue is a sizable tax deduction from stock options that Facebook issued to its employees.
Stock options, like regular cash salaries, are tax-deductible for companies. Companies can use those deductions to offset their profits, and apply those losses to previous years, too. That's how a company could even be eligible for a refund in a year when it made money.
Citizens for Tax Justice, the advocacy group, says Facebook (FB) will receive a tax refund of nearly $430 million as a result of those options.
Facebook said in an e-mail that the company believes "in paying our fair share, and we do pay our fair share."
I know this is one paragraph over the limit, but that last one just had to be included.