Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,942 posts)
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 05:09 AM Dec 12

Rumors swirl about F-35 contract

Ordinarily I won’t give any weight to “Trump says” comments or articles in The New York Post.

Back in January 2024, though, I went to a presentation Steve Herman gave. He came across as pretty levelheaded. For that reason, I’m passing this on.

President-elect Trump has told Lockheed CEO Jim Taiclet he plans to cancel the $1 trillion F-35 contract because "China is winning the fighter race while Lockheed sends executives to DEI camps," according to NY Post financial correspondent Lydia Moynihan.

https://bsky.app/profile/w7voa.journa.host.ap.brid.gy/post/3ld2refkvjfq2

From Lydia Moynihan at Twitter:

Scoop: Trump told Lockheed CEO Jim Taiclet that he plans to cancel the $1T F-35 contract that was struck last month. "China is winning the fighter race while Lockheed sends executives to DEI camps," a source close to Trumps said of the decision.

https://x.com/ljmoynihan
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rumors swirl about F-35 contract (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Dec 12 OP
It won't happen. cloudbase Dec 12 #1
Understood. There are factories in rural Montana turning out mahatmakanejeeves Dec 12 #2
Good morning to you as well. cloudbase Dec 12 #3
They republicans have been successful oldmanlynn Dec 12 #7
Sounds more like a plan to weaken the US military House of Roberts Dec 12 #4
Wouldn't that be a good thing though? druidity33 Dec 12 #5
That "debacle" is currently in service, or will soon be, with multiple US allies VMA131Marine Dec 12 #6
I understand that... druidity33 Dec 12 #8

cloudbase

(5,828 posts)
1. It won't happen.
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 05:38 AM
Dec 12

Defense contractors are smart enough to source subcontractors from just about every congressional district in the country.

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,942 posts)
2. Understood. There are factories in rural Montana turning out
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 05:41 AM
Dec 12

widgets that go into planes, tanks, ships, et al.

Thanks for writing, and good morning.

oldmanlynn

(530 posts)
7. They republicans have been successful
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 09:28 AM
Dec 12

They republicans have been successful at painting DEI as a bad thing with little to no counter by anyone. Diversity equity and inclusion is now dead and a negative thing.

Companies left and right are abandoning DEI quicker than a stinky turd is flushed.

We have to learn how to counter misinformation and the Republicans Russian style propaganda.

House of Roberts

(5,777 posts)
4. Sounds more like a plan to weaken the US military
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 08:07 AM
Dec 12

at the behest of Putin. If China is 'winning the fighter race' we should be doing more, not less. I know that's expensive, but the alternative is falling behind technologically.

druidity33

(6,606 posts)
5. Wouldn't that be a good thing though?
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 08:38 AM
Dec 12

The F35 has been a debacle and money suck from the get go. I'm not even sure the thing will EVER be worth the money WE"VE already spent on it.



VMA131Marine

(4,690 posts)
6. That "debacle" is currently in service, or will soon be, with multiple US allies
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 09:01 AM
Dec 12

Projected orders total over 4,000 aircraft and if it were scrapped a replacement would take decades to develop.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_operators

druidity33

(6,606 posts)
8. I understand that...
Thu Dec 12, 2024, 02:22 PM
Dec 12

but, i have also heard that Air Force personnel ...the people who fly these things have called them death traps. Wasn't it supposed to be in service 10 years ago? And were it scrapped, who loses the money? Grumman? Boeing? Honestly i think some of the countries on the receiving list would be happier not getting it, but were pressured to put in orders many years ago. Does the world really need 4,000 more War jets?

Just thinking out loud here. Feel free to ignore me. I recognize you may have skin in the game. Not trying to be a jerk.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Rumors swirl about F-35 c...