Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumHow To Reduce Gun-Related Deaths In America By Over 80%
On the other side of the aisle though, the Republicans refused to admit that any gun control laws would have changed anything. They generally refuse to talk about gun control, and they continue to argue that the best way to reduce gun deaths in America, is to have everyone own more guns! And aside from pointing out the general absurdity of trying to reduce gun deaths by arming more people, it's been very difficult to prove that gun control is effective. Perhaps more importantly, it's also been very difficult to figure out which gun control laws are actually effective in curbing gun deaths.
That's in large part because of the Dickey Amendment that the Republican Congress passed in 1996 on the behalf of the NRA. The Dickey Amendment said plainly that "None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control." After last year's mass shooting at Umpqua Community College, former Congressman Jay Dickey told the Huffington Post: "I wish we had started the proper research and kept it going all this time. I have regrets."
It's good that Dickey has regrets about the amendment, but it doesn't change the fact that we've lost 20 years of gun violence research because of the unadulterated greed of gun manufacturers and the NRA's willingness to buy legislators like Dickey. What the NRA and the Republican shills for the gun lobby in Congress really don't want you to know, is that it is possible to reduce gun deaths by passing sensible gun control legislation.
http://sputniknews.com/radio_thom_hartmann_show/20160316/1036380674/how-to-reduce-gun-related-deaths-in-America.html#ixzz435AsbMb5
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)ANYTHING that claims "ballistic imprinting or microstamping" actually works? Maryland and New York both had laws that required this, it didn't work to solve a single crime and both states dropped the programs.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)needledriver
(836 posts)And here I was sure this was going to be a post about firearms safety training in school, an end to the anti drug wars, and more funding for mental health care and suicide prevention.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)"ballistic imprinting or microstamping"
GreydeeThos
(958 posts)If we implement the plan from this drive by post and get 80% reduction, and
If we implement the plan from this
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172188903
drive by post and get a 90% reduction,
we could have a 170% reduction in gun deaths!
Think of it! A 170 percent reduction in gun deaths. That could make a difference.
[/font]
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)80% + 90% isn't 170% -- it's 8090%
DonP
(6,185 posts)Each one promised to increase my gas mileage by at least 20% so I bought 8 of them.
I finally got rid of them.
I just got tired of stopping every few miles to siphon all that extra gas they kept saving me out of the tank so it didn't spill over.
That story is every bit as true as the Gun Control statistics we see.