Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,767 posts)
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 04:08 PM Jul 2023

Judge rules Kansas Highway Patrol 'waged war on motorists,' violated constitutional rights

Source: Kansas City Star

Judge rules Kansas Highway Patrol ‘waged war on motorists,’ violated constitutional rights

Katie Moore, Katie Bernard
Fri, July 21, 2023 at 2:40 PM EDT·4 min read

The Kansas Highway Patrol “has waged war on motorists,” a federal judge wrote in a scathing ruling against the agency’s practice of extending car stops in hopes of discovering drugs.

In the order filed Friday, U.S. District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil wrote that patrol’s tactics in traffic stops violated the Constitution.

The practice, called the “Kansas two step,” is a maneuver in which troopers at the end of a traffic stop take a couple of steps toward their patrol car before turning around to initiate a voluntary interaction with the driver.

The strategy would buy the patrol extra time to probe for incriminating information or get a drug-sniffing dog to a location.

“As wars go, this one is relatively easy,” Vratil wrote. “It’s simple and cheap, and for motorists, it’s not a fair fight. The war is basically a question of numbers: stop enough cars and you’re bound to discover drugs. And what’s the harm if a few constitutional rights are trampled along the way?”

-snip-

Read more: https://news.yahoo.com/judge-rules-kansas-highway-patrol-184013769.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge rules Kansas Highway Patrol 'waged war on motorists,' violated constitutional rights (Original Post) Eugene Jul 2023 OP
"Am I free to leave?" ret5hd Jul 2023 #1
I knew this was going to happen MuseRider Jul 2023 #2
Reminds me Rebl2 Jul 2023 #4
LOL there is certainly cause for that MuseRider Jul 2023 #7
Well Rebl2 Jul 2023 #10
LOL! MuseRider Jul 2023 #11
Good. This was a blatant attempt to try to get around Rodriguez v United States. rsdsharp Jul 2023 #3
Last time I drove through KS (a little over a decade ago) They had signs on the interstate. Gore1FL Jul 2023 #5
I do not remember that MuseRider Jul 2023 #6
I think the one I saw was around Salina on I-70. Gore1FL Jul 2023 #8
Wichita is a ways from the border so that cannot be why they MuseRider Jul 2023 #9

ret5hd

(21,320 posts)
1. "Am I free to leave?"
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 04:17 PM
Jul 2023

“Yes”
No further interaction is necessary. Put it in drive and go.

And always film the police. If you are too afraid to do that overtly, just start recording and lay the phone down on the seat or console screen side down. At least their will be an audio recording.

MuseRider

(34,408 posts)
2. I knew this was going to happen
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 04:35 PM
Jul 2023

when the rest, or most of the rest, of the country grew the fuck up and legalized weed we will not. It is still called by our legislators, EVIL weed. It has always been like that. Growing up we would drive to Missouri so my mother could buy her bourbon. We would stash it after wrapping it up in various places, a suitcase brought for the purpose and other things and hope we could cross the boarder back into Kansas and make it all the way home, 60 or so miles. We were the state that made people flying over give their drink cups to the stewards and stewardess while flying over the state. What they used to do to us during the Vern Miller days made it hard to even go out and make it to some place on time.

Of course Kansas is doing this. It never fails to do the dumbest things in the world.

MuseRider

(34,408 posts)
7. LOL there is certainly cause for that
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 05:34 PM
Jul 2023

but I think there is cause in most states, at least in some parts of them. I have lived here all my life and have no reason to move. I am comfortable on my farm and my neighbors are nice but I have no clue how they vote. I have worked on a lot of issues in the area and did a ton of work for the rights of the LGBTQ+ citizens in this state. Nobody has ever questioned me about that or cared about what I was up to. We won BTW. We also won last year for abortion rights. It is an odd state. It took the 50 state strategy to move it and as soon as that was over we were done. My family lived here for many decades and fought with John Brown to keep it free when he was here and worked to keep the Underground Railroad going very close to where I live now. For me it is too much home to leave but as to the point, what is the matter with Kansas, it is complicated and twisted and will take more people to undo the problems than we have who are interested in doing it. IMO

Rebl2

(14,941 posts)
10. Well
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 07:42 PM
Jul 2023

I am in KCMO, so I keep up with some of what goes on in KS. Sometimes I feel MO is worse. I hate to say it because I was born here and have never lived anywhere else. Maybe I should be saying what’s the matter with Missouri 😐.

MuseRider

(34,408 posts)
11. LOL!
Sat Jul 22, 2023, 08:18 AM
Jul 2023

I knew that you lived there from a previous post a while back and totally forgot. No contest, both states have their ups and downs. It would be nice to settle on the upside now and again but somehow that never lasts for very long.

rsdsharp

(10,287 posts)
3. Good. This was a blatant attempt to try to get around Rodriguez v United States.
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 04:55 PM
Jul 2023

That was a 6-3 2015 SOTUS decision authored by RBG which held law enforcement can’t unreasonably delay (beyond about 20 minutes) a traffic stop to bring in a drug sniffing dog. Kennedy, and of course, Alito and Thomas dissented.

Gore1FL

(21,990 posts)
5. Last time I drove through KS (a little over a decade ago) They had signs on the interstate.
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 05:22 PM
Jul 2023

They warned of drug-sniffing dogs ahead. They were always right before an odd exit. Of course, they weren't stopping interstate traffic to violate the 4th amendment. I imagine they stopped anyone getting off at the exit.

MuseRider

(34,408 posts)
6. I do not remember that
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 05:26 PM
Jul 2023

but cannot think it impossible. Was this in Western Kansas or the Central to Western Kansas route? Those are the only places I have seen signage like that but nothing surprises me about this state.

Gore1FL

(21,990 posts)
8. I think the one I saw was around Salina on I-70.
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 06:55 PM
Jul 2023

Here is an article about one on another interstate in Wichita. Seems like the asaem deal.
The article was from 2015. My experience was 2010-2012ish.

https://www.ksn.com/news/drug-check-lanes-pop-up-north-of-wichita/

MuseRider

(34,408 posts)
9. Wichita is a ways from the border so that cannot be why they
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 07:02 PM
Jul 2023

are checking there. Oh well, it has been taken care of now...right? RIGHT? They will always find a way.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Drug Policy»Judge rules Kansas Highwa...