Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forum"Earlier today the DOJ and Texas colluded with Reed O'Connor to erase a Biden-era regulation."
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
DOJ has been doing this to block in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants see: https://www.lawdork.com/p/doj-manufactures-another-lawsuit but that was regarding state laws and policies. This is the reverse.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
· 7h
🚨Per @kyledcheney.bsky.social, earlier today the DOJ and Texas colluded with Reed OConnor to erase a Biden-era regulation permitting immigration judges to administratively close removal cases.
Texas filed this morning, DOJ filed a consent decree hours later, and OConnor entered final judgment.
STATE OF TEXAS
Plaintiff,
on so
V.
Civil Action No. 7:26-CV-00070-0
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ET AL.,
Defendants.
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
Before the Court is the Parties" Joint Motion for Entry of a Consent Judgment. ECF No. 3.
Having considered the Motion, the Complaint (ECF No. I), and applicable law, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Accordingly, the Court hereby DECLARES that the challenged regulation, Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings, 89 Fed. Reg. 46,742 (May 29, 2024) {Administrative Closure Rule"}, is in excess of statutory authority and contrary
to law.
The Court further DECLARES that no statute authorizes immigration judges to indefi-
nitely administratively close or suspend adjudication of a case before them.'
The Court further ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES as follows:
1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §$ 1331, 1346, and
136l, and is authorized to award the requested relief under 5 U.S.C. $$ 702, 703, and
706; 8 U.S.C. §5 1361, 2201, and 2202; and the Court's inherent equitable powers;
'See Hemandez-Serrano v: Barr, 981 F.3d 459, 465-66 (6th Cir. 2020).
Case 7:26-cv-00070-O Document 5 Filed 06/22/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD 76
2. Defendants, as well as their successors, agents, subordinate agencies, and employees, are hereby permanently enjoined from enforcing the Administrative Closure Rule;
3. Defendants, as well as their successors, agents, subordinate agencies, and employees, are permanently enjoined from promulgating regulations that permit immigration judges the authority to administratively close removal proceedings without reaching the merits of a case absent an express statutory basis to do so;
4. The Administrative Closure Rule is hereby vacated;
5. The Parties enter into this final Consent Judgment voluntarily and waive any right to appeal from this Judgment;2
6. All remaining requests for relief are dismissed without prejudice.
This final judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pr
10:07 PM · Jun 22, 2026
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
DOJ has been doing this to block in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants see: https://www.lawdork.com/p/doj-manufactures-another-lawsuit but that was regarding state laws and policies. This is the reverse.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
· 7h
🚨Per @kyledcheney.bsky.social, earlier today the DOJ and Texas colluded with Reed OConnor to erase a Biden-era regulation permitting immigration judges to administratively close removal cases.
Texas filed this morning, DOJ filed a consent decree hours later, and OConnor entered final judgment.
STATE OF TEXAS
Plaintiff,
on so
V.
Civil Action No. 7:26-CV-00070-0
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ET AL.,
Defendants.
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
Before the Court is the Parties" Joint Motion for Entry of a Consent Judgment. ECF No. 3.
Having considered the Motion, the Complaint (ECF No. I), and applicable law, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Accordingly, the Court hereby DECLARES that the challenged regulation, Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings, 89 Fed. Reg. 46,742 (May 29, 2024) {Administrative Closure Rule"}, is in excess of statutory authority and contrary
to law.
The Court further DECLARES that no statute authorizes immigration judges to indefi-
nitely administratively close or suspend adjudication of a case before them.'
The Court further ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES as follows:
1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §$ 1331, 1346, and
136l, and is authorized to award the requested relief under 5 U.S.C. $$ 702, 703, and
706; 8 U.S.C. §5 1361, 2201, and 2202; and the Court's inherent equitable powers;
'See Hemandez-Serrano v: Barr, 981 F.3d 459, 465-66 (6th Cir. 2020).
Case 7:26-cv-00070-O Document 5 Filed 06/22/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD 76
2. Defendants, as well as their successors, agents, subordinate agencies, and employees, are hereby permanently enjoined from enforcing the Administrative Closure Rule;
3. Defendants, as well as their successors, agents, subordinate agencies, and employees, are permanently enjoined from promulgating regulations that permit immigration judges the authority to administratively close removal proceedings without reaching the merits of a case absent an express statutory basis to do so;
4. The Administrative Closure Rule is hereby vacated;
5. The Parties enter into this final Consent Judgment voluntarily and waive any right to appeal from this Judgment;2
6. All remaining requests for relief are dismissed without prejudice.
This final judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pr
10:07 PM · Jun 22, 2026
DOJ has been doing this to block in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants â see: www.lawdork.com/p/doj-manufa... â but that was regarding state laws and policies. This is the reverse.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2026-06-23T02:07:16.893Z
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
And, of course, Reed OConnor is very willing to go along with this. He didnt even wait for the other party when he had a chance to harm trans people.
https://www.lawdork.com/i/196237187/the-secret-subpoena-enforcement-petition
The Fifth Circuit would like to run the United States
The far-right federal appeals court and the district court judges below them are taking actions to control and influence what happens outside of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
www.lawdork.com
10:10 PM · Jun 22, 2026
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
And, of course, Reed OConnor is very willing to go along with this. He didnt even wait for the other party when he had a chance to harm trans people.
https://www.lawdork.com/i/196237187/the-secret-subpoena-enforcement-petition
The Fifth Circuit would like to run the United States
The far-right federal appeals court and the district court judges below them are taking actions to control and influence what happens outside of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
www.lawdork.com
10:10 PM · Jun 22, 2026
And, of course, Reed OâConnor is very willing to go along with this. He didnât even wait for the other party when he had a chance to harm trans people. www.lawdork.com/i/196237187/...
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2026-06-23T02:10:28.390Z
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Earlier today the DOJ and Texas colluded with Reed O'Connor to erase a Biden-era regulation." (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
12 hrs ago
OP
slightlv
(8,180 posts)1. I am SO antsy to start turning back
these outlandish hits against our civil rights and liberties... not to mention removing all the "laws" that were justified with Repug lies!