Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mgc1961

(1,263 posts)
Thu May 31, 2012, 08:52 AM May 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (mgc1961) on Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:58 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) mgc1961 May 2012 OP
No. The article clearly shows that he covered the story to the best of his ability despite the 1monster May 2012 #1
I like this very plausible story. mgc1961 May 2012 #2
Yes, it'd make a great movie. But who'd play Andy Rooney? Bucky Jun 2012 #5
Its possible, just as Jimmy Dolittles Raid on Tokyo was possible HooptieWagon May 2012 #3
A V2 ArtiChoke Jun 2012 #4
Not very plausible sarisataka Jun 2012 #6

1monster

(11,026 posts)
1. No. The article clearly shows that he covered the story to the best of his ability despite the
Thu May 31, 2012, 05:14 PM
May 2012

efforts of the powers that were to bury the story.

 

mgc1961

(1,263 posts)
2. I like this very plausible story.
Thu May 31, 2012, 06:08 PM
May 2012

It has the makings of a good historical novel. Perhaps, it's a job for ... Captain America!

Bucky

(55,334 posts)
5. Yes, it'd make a great movie. But who'd play Andy Rooney?
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 01:10 PM
Jun 2012
"Have you ever wondered why V-2 rockets never blew up New York?"

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
3. Its possible, just as Jimmy Dolittles Raid on Tokyo was possible
Thu May 31, 2012, 10:36 PM
May 2012

when the Japanese didnt think it could happen. However, by 1944 the Uboats could barely move in the Atlantic... anti sub air patrols, development of radar and sonar. Uboats couldnt even surface long enough to charge their batteries without being spotted (thus leading to "snorkles&quot , and their speed and range while submerged was very limited. The Uboats were essentially surface craft that submerged to attack, or they lay in wait for a target to come near. So, while it is possible for a Uboat to have crossed the Atlantic and attempted a rocket attack, it would have been against pretty long odds. My guess is military brass didnt want to give even a slim possibility any credence as it may have led to general panic.

ArtiChoke

(61 posts)
4. A V2
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 09:24 AM
Jun 2012

is pretty much outside the realm of possibility. The largest U-boat was about 300' in length with a diameter of 30' while the V2 had a length of 45' and a diameter of over 5'. It would have been nearly impossible for a U-boat to launch a missle of that size. And the V2 reached a speed over Mach 4 so WW2 fighters would have been useless against it. USA Today is losing it over 1945's version of Sadam's WMD. A V1 was much smaller and slower, Allied fighters shot down several. They were not much of a terror weapon.

sarisataka

(21,268 posts)
6. Not very plausible
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 07:49 PM
Jun 2012

The largest U boats were the Type X B mine layers. Several were used to transport items to Japan. http://www.uboat.net/types/xb.htm

They had an overall length of about 278' and a beam of 28' 6" external but only 14' 8" internally.
It is conceivable these subs could transport either V-1s or V-2s. Launching would be an entirely different matter. The sub would have to surface, construct the missile then launch it. It would be extremely difficult.
Germany built 8 of these boats and all were accounted for with no gaps in their war records indicating such a secret mission.

The Type XIV supply boats would be another candidate. There is anecdotal evidence that one or two may have had trial ramps installed for launching V-1s but no conclusive proof of this.

By comparison, the purpose built Japanese I-400 class could carry and launch three seaplanes. They were 400 ft long and could launch all three planes in 45 minutes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-400_class_submarine

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»World History»This message was self-del...