Mental Health Support
Related: About this forumThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (BainsBane) on Thu Feb 7, 2013, 08:14 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
Tobin S.
(10,420 posts)How about a link? I'd at least inform a host of this group if not the rest of us.
Response to Tobin S. (Reply #1)
BainsBane This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tobin S.
(10,420 posts)But, regardless, PMs should not be made public. I think it violates a broader community standard. NYC_SKP should have alerted on the PM if he or she thought it was offensive.
Denninmi
(6,581 posts)But, bottom line is, you did try to do the right thing. So try not to let it hurt -- I know, much easier said than done.
BainsBane
(54,896 posts)Thanks for the support. How are you doing?
Denninmi
(6,581 posts)Been rocking and rolling at work on tax season and doing all of the fun stuff on the side, so I can't complain.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)BainsBane
(54,896 posts)It is not for the amusement of the entirety of DU. It is about the confidentiality among a group of people with mental illness. Meta is the last place this belongs.
Seems better here due to the sensitive nature. But ymmv.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)as a non-party to the discussion. That's something done fairly regularly within the framework of Meta and the definition of metadiscussion is discussion about discussion which this is.
Perhaps Tobin or one of the other founders of the group can comment on whether MHSG has always had a practice of allowing originating posts that include callouts. If that's not the case, perhaps Mo can comment on whether MSHG is turning to a new policy.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I would say you skated along the outer margins of the envelope of long standing practices of MHSG and more generally DU.
It seems plain enough you went beyond the other DUer's boundaries of comfort, regardless of intent. That's the stuff of which apologies can be built.
You took information you knew from MHSG and acted on it outside of MHSG. As it turns out, that was done in a manner that was objectionable to the person you contacted. Regardless of your intent.
You invoked a very common stigmatizing phrase (you need your meds checked) against the mentally ill, even if your intent was good that's an exceptionally tricky business.
You played MD by long distance when you started dx'ing mania, even if your intent was good.
BainsBane
(54,896 posts)I see that. I tried to make my intent clear in the thread in which he posted the PM.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)The original screw up is now compounded by the call out here of another MHSG member for what happened in a main forum.
There are many MHSG readers who aren't posters in MHSG because they fear this sort of thing. How do you suppose people with those concerns read your subject line?
BainsBane
(54,896 posts)that was the last thing I wanted to do, which is why I didn't provide his name. I'll self delete.