Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Health
Related: About this forumAspirin can reduce the risk of cancer - and we're starting to understand why
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260420-cancer-how-aspirin-may-be-a-powerful-new-weapon-against-tumours(snip)
It is here that John Burn's study of patients with Lynch Syndrome, which vastly increases the risk of colorectal and other forms of cancer, enters the picture. In 2020, Burn published the results of a landmark randomised controlled trial of 861 patients with the condition. Following the participants for 10 years, his team discovered that people who had taken a daily 600mg dose of aspirin for at least two years effectively halved their risk of colorectal cancer.
His team have since conducted a second trial, which is currently under peer review. The early results suggest that a much lower dose of aspirin (75-100mg) is just as effective if not more. "The people who took aspirin for two years had 50% fewer cancers in the colon," he says. "What we want to do is keep on going for a few more years because the data is going to get better as time goes on. (Nick James, the very first patient to enter the trial, was among the ones who appeared to have benefited.)
(snip)
Given these results, it is natural to wonder whether aspirin could benefit other patient groups. Martling has investigated whether aspirin can reduce the risk of metastasis in people who've already had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Her team focused on people with common mutations in their bowel or rectal tumours. "Of all patients getting colorectal cancer, 40% have one of the mutations we have studied," she explains. Previous research had suggested these people may respond particularly well to aspirin.
The three-year randomised controlled trial involved 2,980 patients, with one group taking 160mg of aspirin daily, starting within three months of surgery, and the other receiving a placebo. The aspirin-treated group had less than half the risk of recurrence a highly significant effect size. "That's a large group of the patients," says Martling. What's more, both Martling's and Burn's trials showed very few cases of adverse effects in the people taking aspirin.
(snip)
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aspirin can reduce the risk of cancer - and we're starting to understand why (Original Post)
nitpicked
Tuesday
OP
hlthe2b
(114,250 posts)1. Good to see they repeated with low dose aspirin. Geez 600 mg daily is a lot.
But, aspirin is always reviewed with interpretation directed more at the bleeding risk--real, but that masks other positive impacts (even if primary prevention for FIRST attack may be more limited than previously recognized)...
Interesting findings.
appalachiablue
(44,104 posts)2. This news is promising, thanks for posting.
riversedge
(81,210 posts)3. So glad they are expanding to Other cancers: 'who've had colorectal, breast, gastroesophageal, or prostate cancer in the
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260420-cancer-how-aspirin-may-be-a-powerful-new-weapon-against-tumours
It is not yet clear whether aspirin could protect patients from other cancers as well but we may soon have some answers. Langley is currently running a large randomised controlled trial with 11,000 participants who've had colorectal, breast, gastroesophageal, or prostate cancer in the UK, Ireland and India. Her team will be looking at the effect of a daily 100mg or 300mg preventative dose of aspirin, and they're hoping to have results next year.
"We really are the first to explore the role of aspirin in other tumour types," she says. She is aiming to replicate Martling's findings for colorectal cancer, as well as gathering funds to investigate the implications of the specific mutations in the other cancers, too. The replication is key, she says, as authorities ideally want two sets of trial results before they make recommendations for patients.
How does it work?