Feminists
Related: About this forumSaudi women at Olympic Games a sham.
By Jocelyne Cesari
CNN
August 1, 2012
For the first time, Saudi Arabia sent two women to the Olympics -- Wojdan Shaherkani and Sarah Attar, who will compete in judo and track and field. But their participation is far from a groundbreaking step for Saudi women.
It was touch and go whether one of the Saudi women, Shaherkani, would even participate this year when the president of the International Federation of Judo said women wearing headscarves would not be allowed to compete for fear of choking and injury. The issue has been resolved and she will participate in a form of headgear that complies with Saudi's strict Islamic dress codes for women.
But if Shaherkani had withdrawn, it would not have been a setback for Saudi women because her inclusion was not a sign of advancement. The presence of Saudi women is the result of several months of pressure by the International Olympics Committee on Saudi Arabia to include women competitors or face being banned from participation.
The situation for female athletes in Saudi Arabia is bleak. Saudi women in general are denied the right to practice sports. Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world that prevents girls from taking part in sports in government schools. Physical education is allowed only in private schools. Women are not allowed to play in official sports clubs or even watch matches in stadiums. Girls' football, volleyball and basketball games in private schools and colleges are held secretly.
More: http://us.cnn.com/2012/08/01/opinion/cesari-saudi-women-sports/index.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)and with any luck it will be a chink in the misogynistic armor that is Saudi culture. I disagree with the author --Shaherkani withdrawing would have been a setback for Saudi women. Whether her participation and Attar's will make any difference remains to be seen but at least there is now a precedent for Saudi women participating.
obamanut2012
(27,884 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I am annoyed at the sham of it. I think I would be equally angry at any country presenting a person of color, a different religion, etc. the same way. The women were hopelessly outclassed and clearly thrown in there to avoid the country being banned from international competition.
However, if it does result in a generalized trend towards a better climate towards women in Saudi Arabia, I will be happy about it, warts and all.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)leaving a scratch in the misogynist armor, never mind a chink. They scratched around for a couple of bones to throw to the IOC to protect their precious male teams, that's all. It wouldn't surprise me if, after this or the next Olympics, they simply pointed to the poor showings, claimed they had no Olympic-class athletes to send, and just played the God card if they do get sanctioned.
I'd dearly love to eat those words four or eight years from now. Go ahead, Saudis. Prove my cynicism wrong.
I'm glad for Shaherkani's sake, if nothing else, that she got to participate. Good for her and good for Attar!
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)it's not much of a victory but it is some
just because there is much further to go doesn't mean that nothing was achieved
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)We helped create the monster so we could have cheap gas.
DURHAM D
(32,853 posts)was just before the games began. A female from a predominately Muslim country was elected as a V-President of the IOC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nawal_El_Moutawakel
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2012/07/26/el-moutawakel-and-reedie-elected-ioc-vps957869/
I read that she is the person most responsible for the increased female participation this year (every country had a female in their delegation for the first time) and her election is the break-through that can really matter going forward.
obamanut2012
(27,884 posts)Thanks for posting it!