LGBT
Related: About this forumTennessee House passes bill stating same-sex marriage does not have to be recognized (ABC)
Tennessee House passes bill stating same-sex marriage does not have to be recognized (ABC)In a 68-24 vote, HB 1473 passed the House. The bill states private citizens and organizations are not bound by the 14th Amendment or the Supreme Courts decision in Obergefell v. Hodges to recognize a marriage between individuals of the same sex.
It also adds that officials cannot be disciplined or sanctioned for refusing to officiate marriages between people of the same sex.
The board shall not discipline, sanction, or threaten to discipline or sanction any person for declining to celebrate or officiate at a marriage or commitment ceremony that falls outside the definition of marriage provided in this code. HB 1473
As discussions began on the bill, one woman was removed from the balcony of the chamber by the Tennessee Highway Patrol after she began yelling and disrupting the session.
Representative Gino Bulso (R-Brentwood) told the House that this is a bill that does not change existing law. It simply clarifies existing law.
...
Emphasis added.
But I say a first step to eliminating same sex marriage rights, no matter what they say. .
SheltieLover
(78,979 posts)Ritabert
(2,217 posts)SheltieLover
(78,979 posts)😓
Ritabert
(2,217 posts)SheltieLover
(78,979 posts)Ritabert
(2,217 posts)Lovie777
(22,444 posts)since he's a RW.
QueerDuck
(1,341 posts)It's the first of many attempts to overturn Obergefell. (Fuckers!!)
SheltieLover
(78,979 posts)70sEraVet
(5,394 posts)the cities solved the problem of having to integrate the public swimming pools by filling them in with dirt -- if EVERYBODY could use the pools, then NOBODY could use the pools.
Seems like that tactic would be effective for the same-sex marriage problem -- if EVERYONE can get married, then NO ONE can be married. Tennessee could have the distinction of being the first state in the nation to deny governmental intrusion into the relationships of consenting adults or the religious rites that those individuals engage in. The state could declare that the term 'marriage' would revert back to its historical foundation as a religious ceremony, and as such, should be completely separate from government, as stated in the US Constitution.
I've been WAITING for the opportunity to put that idea in writing!
paleotn
(21,934 posts)then we're not bound by Texas v White. Bye!