Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumOhio Anti-Renewable Bill Would Likely Exclude Coal Generation, Since It Requires Minimum Capacity Factor of 50%
An idea for restricting renewable energy has traveled from Utah to Louisiana and is now in New Hampshire, Arizona and Ohio. The proposed legislation is part of a push by fossil-fuel-aligned groups to promote natural gas and hurt competing power sources. The Ohio bill, Senate Bill 294, amounts to a ban on utility-scale wind and solar by adopting a new definition of reliable energy source that would require new power plants to be able to operate at any time of day or night.
In addition, power plants must have a minimum capacity factor of 50 percent. A plants capacity factor is a measure of how its actual output compares to the maximum that is technically possible. If a plant runs at full capacity around the clock for a year, its capacity factor would be 100 percent. Wind and solar plants have lower capacity factors because they depend on the sun and wind. But grid operators and power companies still rely heavily on wind and solar because they understand the attributes of their power plants and view them as part of a portfolio.
To help explain, lets look at the average capacity factors for each major power plant technology in 2024, the most recent full year available from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Its no surprise to see nuclear at the top, with 90.8 percent. But then there is a big drop-off before the runner-up, combined-cycle natural gas, at 60.5 percent. Wood-burning power plants are next, with 55.8 percent. (This is a small but significant source of electricity, with 7,300 megawatts of U.S. capacity.) After that, every other power source is below the 50 percent benchmark in the Ohio bill. This includes renewables, such as wind and solar, which have capacity factors of 34.3 percent and 23.2 percent, respectively. Hydropower, another leading renewable energy source, is 34.6 percent.
But many fossil-fuel power plants also fall below the threshold. This includes coal-fired power plants, with 42.6 percent. It also includes natural gas peaker plants, such as simple-cycle gas turbines, with 13.9 percent, and all oil-burning plants, which are less than 10 percent.
EDIT
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/19022026/inside-clean-energy-ohio-wind-solar-coal-ban/
NNadir
(37,683 posts)The build out of redundant systems, particularly those divorced from demand, as all so called "renewable energy" systems except hydroelectricity, is unsustainable and thus of dubious environmental value.
We have fans of gas peaker plants here at DU, but I'm not among them. Their existence is a side product of pretending that so called "renewable energy" is "green."
thought crime
(1,411 posts)Solar and Wind can be integrated into energy producing systems (eg. grids). This requires more sophisticated engineering but is proving itself as a flexible and often overall cheaper source of energy. It can be seen in the use of solar, in particular, in developing countries. And the minimum-capacity of Wind energy probably increases for Offshore Wind.