Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumUCSD: Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources Will Increase Price Tag to Decarbonize the Grid
https://today.ucsd.edu/story/plans-for-a-zero-carbon-grid-need-to-include-the-impact-of-climate-change-on-water-systemsImpact of Climate Change on Water Resources Will Increase Price Tag to Decarbonize the Grid
Published Date November 25, 2024
Story by:
Ioana Patringenaru - ipatrin@ucsd.edu
A new study warns that current plans to achieve zero emissions on the grid by 2050 vastly underestimate the required investments in generation and transmission infrastructure. The reason: these plans do not account for climate changes impacts on water resources.
Specifically, changes in water availability caused by climate change could decrease hydropower generation by up to 23% by the year 2050, while electricity demand could increase by 2%. Both these phenomena would come together in summer to compound impacts on the grid.
To adapt to these impacts, the Western United States would need to build up to 139 gigawatts of power capacity between 2030 and 2050equivalent to nearly three times Californias peak power demand, or up to 13 gigawatts in transmission capacity during the same time period. The total additional investment would come with a price tag of up to $150 billion.
That is the conclusion of a study published Nov. 25 in Nature Communications (Szinai et al., 2024) and co-authored by a team of Canadian and U.S. researchers, including at the University of California San Diego.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54162-9Published Date November 25, 2024
Story by:
Ioana Patringenaru - ipatrin@ucsd.edu
A new study warns that current plans to achieve zero emissions on the grid by 2050 vastly underestimate the required investments in generation and transmission infrastructure. The reason: these plans do not account for climate changes impacts on water resources.
Specifically, changes in water availability caused by climate change could decrease hydropower generation by up to 23% by the year 2050, while electricity demand could increase by 2%. Both these phenomena would come together in summer to compound impacts on the grid.
To adapt to these impacts, the Western United States would need to build up to 139 gigawatts of power capacity between 2030 and 2050equivalent to nearly three times Californias peak power demand, or up to 13 gigawatts in transmission capacity during the same time period. The total additional investment would come with a price tag of up to $150 billion.
That is the conclusion of a study published Nov. 25 in Nature Communications (Szinai et al., 2024) and co-authored by a team of Canadian and U.S. researchers, including at the University of California San Diego.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UCSD: Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources Will Increase Price Tag to Decarbonize the Grid (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Nov 26
OP
CoopersDad
(2,930 posts)1. Did they factor in Data Centers' impact on water and power demands?
I don't think they did.
PG&E projects a doubling of power demand by 2040, or worse.
OKIsItJustMe
(21,016 posts)2. From the Supplementary Material
https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-024-54162-9/MediaObjects/41467_2024_54162_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
4.14 Load
The future load assumed in this analysis represents a case of high energy efficiency and building electrification, as well as increased adoption of Zero Emissions Vehicles (ZEVs), primarily from electric vehicles 13. The load forecast achieves a doubling of the rate of energy efficiency by 2030 in California, compliant with the states SB 350 legislative targets, aggressive building electrification starting in 2020, growing industry electrification, and high levels of electric vehicle adoption. Hourly demand profiles from 2006 (consistent with the weather-year used for calculating solar and wind capacity factors) from FERC Form 714 and a dataset procured from ITRON were used as a base from which demand projects (residential, commercial, industrial, transportation) are scaled by sector to meet states policy targets and reflect population growth 25. Where detailed state/province-level load forecasts with state efficiency, electrification, and population estimates are available (including California, Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, and Alberta) load zone forecasts are scaled to those projections; otherwise forecasts are scaled to the EIAs Annual Energy Outlook projections in the prior SWITCH analysis 13,26. In the 2017 Annual Energy Outlook Electric projections used, population growth across the U.S. is on average about 1% annually, based on the U.S. Census Bureaus mid-case projections at the time 26
.
Electric vehicles are assumed to charge in an unmanaged way (without smart charging or time-of-use rates), based on charging profiles developed with an agent-based mobility model BEAM 27,28
The future load assumed in this analysis represents a case of high energy efficiency and building electrification, as well as increased adoption of Zero Emissions Vehicles (ZEVs), primarily from electric vehicles 13. The load forecast achieves a doubling of the rate of energy efficiency by 2030 in California, compliant with the states SB 350 legislative targets, aggressive building electrification starting in 2020, growing industry electrification, and high levels of electric vehicle adoption. Hourly demand profiles from 2006 (consistent with the weather-year used for calculating solar and wind capacity factors) from FERC Form 714 and a dataset procured from ITRON were used as a base from which demand projects (residential, commercial, industrial, transportation) are scaled by sector to meet states policy targets and reflect population growth 25. Where detailed state/province-level load forecasts with state efficiency, electrification, and population estimates are available (including California, Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, and Alberta) load zone forecasts are scaled to those projections; otherwise forecasts are scaled to the EIAs Annual Energy Outlook projections in the prior SWITCH analysis 13,26. In the 2017 Annual Energy Outlook Electric projections used, population growth across the U.S. is on average about 1% annually, based on the U.S. Census Bureaus mid-case projections at the time 26
.
Electric vehicles are assumed to charge in an unmanaged way (without smart charging or time-of-use rates), based on charging profiles developed with an agent-based mobility model BEAM 27,28