Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicked

(866 posts)
Sat Nov 16, 2024, 11:49 PM Nov 16

'The sixth great extinction is happening', conservation expert warns

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93qvqx5y01o

With her signature shawl draped over her shoulders and silver hair pulled back from her face, Jane Goodall exudes serenity - even over our slightly blurry video call.
(snip)

One of the remedies she wants to talk about today is a tree-planting and habitat restoration mission that her eponymous foundation and non-profit technology company, Ecosia, are carrying out in Uganda. Over the past five years, with the help of local communities and smallholder farmers, the organisations have planted nearly two million trees.

“We’re in the midst of the sixth great extinction,” Dr Goodall tells me during our interview for BBC Radio 4’s Inside Science. “The more we can do to restore nature and protect existing forests, the better.”
(snip)

“If we don't get together and impose tough regulations on what people are able to do to the environment - if we don't rapidly move away from fossil fuel, if we don't put a stop to industrial farming, that's destroying the environment and killing the soil, having a devastating effect on biodiversity - the future ultimately is doomed.”
(snip)
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'The sixth great extinction is happening', conservation expert warns (Original Post) nitpicked Nov 16 OP
Tree Planting is Hippy Hopelessness MrWowWow Nov 17 #1
... 2naSalit Nov 17 #2
That we are in the middle of an actual great extinction is a bit of an exaggeration. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 17 #3
First of all the facts of the percentage loss in some moniss Nov 17 #6
Some species, yes. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 17 #7
And what we're doing now is far faster than what was going on then . . . hatrack Nov 17 #8
Death Stranding. AllyCat Nov 17 #4
K&R jfz9580m Nov 17 #5

MrWowWow

(431 posts)
1. Tree Planting is Hippy Hopelessness
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 12:02 AM
Nov 17

The planet is literally on fire. It's climate is collapsing, and tree planting is suggested? Not a chance of succeeding. Geologic time has contracted to human time. The time to have planted trees to trap carbon was over 50 yes ago. It is not a viable solution to climate change abatement nor its remediation.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(26,840 posts)
3. That we are in the middle of an actual great extinction is a bit of an exaggeration.
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 01:02 AM
Nov 17

With all due respect to Ms Goodall, we are really not in a mass extinction.

In those, anywhere from 75% to 96% of all species went extinct. And during each of them there were vast changes in climate and the like, far vaster than what's going on now.

Here's a link that may prove useful: https://ourworldindata.org/mass-extinctions

moniss

(6,149 posts)
6. First of all the facts of the percentage loss in some
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 02:48 AM
Nov 17

species etc. are actually quite huge. I don't get someone trying to paint Goodall as out of touch etc. because of her indication to plant trees because she also speaks about moving away from fossil fuels and other measures. So she is hardly putting tree planting out there as some universal panacea to correct all ills. But the function of trees and their critical connection to the ecosystem goes way beyond just being carbon traps.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(26,840 posts)
7. Some species, yes.
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 10:19 AM
Nov 17

But what percentage of all species have been lost so far? Specifics matter a lot. Again, we are no where near being in a "6th Mass Distinction."

hatrack

(61,192 posts)
8. And what we're doing now is far faster than what was going on then . . .
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 12:52 PM
Nov 17

Last edited Sun Nov 17, 2024, 01:38 PM - Edit history (1)

The Permian Extinction, to the degree that scientific data allow us to reconstruct it, took between 20,000 and 110,000 years to play out. And that's how long it took for atmospheric CO2 to rise from +./ 400 ppm to +/- 2,500 ppm.

Today's direct data show a roughly 100 ppm increase (that is, 230 billion tons) increase in 65 years. At the rate we're going - i.e. going from 315 ppm in 1958 to 422 ppm as of October 2024, we'll get there much, much more quickly, especially if there are natural systems/processes that we haven't factored into our analysis, and as FF development continues.

And to "get there" - that is, hit levels at which we couldn't live anyway - isn't the main point (CDC classifies CO2 as ILDH (Immediately Dangerous To Life And Health) at 5,000 ppm).

We would have screwed climate stability, crop weather predictability and much more well before we got to the lab-rat level of carbon dioxide intoxication.

Rate of change matters.

jfz9580m

(15,584 posts)
5. K&R
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 02:45 AM
Nov 17

This is what saddens me the most..that we are taking the rest of the biosphere down with our stupid, crass ways as a species.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»'The sixth great extincti...