Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(61,192 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 07:22 AM Nov 14

Oh Well!! "Net-Zero" Banks' Commitments Since 2021 To FF Projects Will Produce CO2 Equal To 7 Years Of US Emissions

EDIT

That’s not all. Since May 2021, global banks that have committed to net-zero have poured almost $1 trillion into companies pursuing expansion of oil and gas projects that would push the world beyond its survivable limits. Taken together, these projects would produce almost seven times the annual emissions of the U.S., according to an analysis by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, or TBIJ. “It’s indefensible,” said John Lang, founder of the Net Zero Tracker that evaluates big companies’ net-zero plans. “There’s no way we can meet the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement if we continue financing the exploration of oil and gas.”

He said banks with net-zero commitments covering direct and indirect emissions could not fund oil and gas expansion. “It’s greenwashing, plain and simple.” It was at COP26 three years ago that a number of major banks first pledged that by 2050, they would cut almost all the emissions from their lending and investments to zero and invest in financial products to offset the remaining emissions — which has come to be known as “net-zero.” Citigroup, for instance, said it would do this in part by helping its clients transition away from fossil fuels and by stopping funding companies that do not.

Many of the banks trumpet their net-zero credentials in public. But Nigel Topping, a member of the U.K.’s Climate Change Committee, explained that even when banks commit to cutting emissions associated with their financing in line with net-zero, “it doesn’t stop them from financing companies that are continuing to expand [oil and gas production].” Citi’s chief executive, Jane Fraser, has said: “As the world’s most global bank, we can help drive the transition to a net-zero economy and make good on the promise of the Paris Agreement.” The bank says it has already beaten its 2030 target and cut CO2 emissions associated with energy clients by 38 percent between 2020 and 2022. But the funds it continues to raise for fossil fuel expanders threatens to lock in oil and gas production — and their emissions — well beyond 2030.

Take its support for BP, which announced record profits in February last year and promptly announced it would scale back its climate commitments and increase investments in oil and gas. It then enlisted the help of Citi and a host of other “net-zero” banks to raise $5.3 billion — and went on to invest $4.8 billion in its oil and gas operations in the first half of this year. BP also announced the first oil to be extracted from a new platform in Azerbaijan’s sector of the Caspian basin, which is expected to be operating until at least 2049, just a year before the world is supposed to have cut its dependence on fossil fuels. BP and Citigroup did not respond to a request for comment. JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo declined to comment.

EDIT

https://grist.org/accountability/net-zero-banks-raised-1-trillion-for-fossil-fuel-giants/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh Well!! "Net-Zero" Banks' Commitments Since 2021 To FF Projects Will Produce CO2 Equal To 7 Years Of US Emissions (Original Post) hatrack Nov 14 OP
Those in an underground cave-fortress will survive bucolic_frolic Nov 14 #1
Yes, and wouldn't it be terrible if those left above ground blocked the ventilation? hatrack Nov 14 #2

bucolic_frolic

(47,572 posts)
1. Those in an underground cave-fortress will survive
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 07:39 AM
Nov 14

But the electronics will be relics of a lost civilization.

hatrack

(61,192 posts)
2. Yes, and wouldn't it be terrible if those left above ground blocked the ventilation?
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 07:02 PM
Nov 14

Tragic, tragic, I tell you.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Oh Well!! "Net-Zero" Ban...