Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 04:40 PM Jun 2012

Should all states go back to paper ballots.

Or how about if they use paper ballots that go through a counting machine they have to count them all by hand for a second count.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should all states go back to paper ballots. (Original Post) hrmjustin Jun 2012 OP
Paper ballots, hand counted, PDJane Jun 2012 #1
YES Blue Owl Jun 2012 #2
Yes KansDem Jun 2012 #3
Because they get paid to count? RobertEarl Jun 2012 #9
Yes. Unless we like gross uncertainty in the most important part of our democracy. Gregorian Jun 2012 #4
Yes, please! n/t madamesilverspurs Jun 2012 #5
I like how WA does it gregoire Jun 2012 #6
Don't they use Optic Scan in WA ? bahrbearian Jun 2012 #7
But they have to make it past the signature "verification" stage... gregoire Jun 2012 #10
Still it goes to a machine, and thats whats scares me, I'd love to see hand counts. bahrbearian Jun 2012 #14
You probably will not approve of the OptiScan truedelphi Jun 2012 #17
Landshark is from Wa, where he sued Sequoia, and chased them out of the state FogerRox Jun 2012 #11
Yes, and all the ballots should be at the polling place on election day. Festivito Jun 2012 #8
Optical scanners cant use regular paper FogerRox Jun 2012 #12
Sure they can. Copy machines are optical scanners. Festivito Jun 2012 #15
totally convinced glinda Jun 2012 #13
Paper ballots, counted by hand Prophet 451 Jun 2012 #16
"rarely any difficulty" ummm, no gregoire Jun 2012 #18

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
3. Yes
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 04:48 PM
Jun 2012

I've never understood why private corporations with super-secret proprietary software are given the responsibility of counting our votes...

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
9. Because they get paid to count?
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jun 2012

In 2000 the republicans stole the election from Gore. Why would they stop there?

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
4. Yes. Unless we like gross uncertainty in the most important part of our democracy.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 04:49 PM
Jun 2012

And who doesn't. It's more like a lottery than voting.

I still cannot figure out why this idiocy still exists. Mind boggling.

 

gregoire

(192 posts)
6. I like how WA does it
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 05:13 PM
Jun 2012

The people that count the mail in votes are not bipartisan. As I've heard the jerk-off Republicans I work for complain, their votes often don't get counted. [insert Nelson from the Simpsons "Ah Ha" picture here]

 

gregoire

(192 posts)
10. But they have to make it past the signature "verification" stage...
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 07:58 PM
Jun 2012

and to the machine. Which reminds me, I need to look into volunteering. Several of my friends that work at Boeing do it every year. I was jealous hearing about their after party after the 2008 election.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
17. You probably will not approve of the OptiScan
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 03:15 PM
Jun 2012

End of the election process if you ever vote for (or maybe even run yourself) and then find that the election results are very close.

In a close election,it is critical that the ballots be counted by hand. But often, the "recount" is done simply by putting the same ballots through the same machine.

In Marin County Calif, in a close election, the people wanting the recount to be a hands on only, no Opti Scan recount, had to come up with 106,000 dollars, with 15% of it up front, to have a recount for the hospital district board, a position that pays zero in salary. the candidate who was seeking that office, a true indie and wonderful community leader, backed off from the recount.

That is why I say: Paper ballots counted ONLY by hand!

Festivito

(13,591 posts)
8. Yes, and all the ballots should be at the polling place on election day.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 07:19 PM
Jun 2012

One should be able to walk into one's polling place, get one's own pre-mailed ballot and submit a changed vote.

The ballots should be kept on display until the longest term of office completes, unless undergoing recount of course. Then they can go to research institutions if wanted, or to anyone who does want them. The last persons able to discard ballots should be in government.

Ballots can be printed on plain old 8.5x11 sheets off an ordinary computer printer.

Valid ballots can be counted by machine after being stamped by an poll-worker's personal marred stamp made for that day with a trace element in the ink. And, the machine count of ballots poll-workers entered must match the number of votes in that poll-workers' list of voters. A poll-worker thumb print on each would be good as well.

Manual random and requested recounts are mandatory with a mandatory full manual recount if any error is found.

If contested or close, all ballots go online and are recounted there as well as recounting the paper.

Festivito

(13,591 posts)
15. Sure they can. Copy machines are optical scanners.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:17 PM
Jun 2012

It's just a matter of designing a layout and programming a reader for the scanned image.

It could also handle instant runoff voting.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
16. Paper ballots, counted by hand
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:26 PM
Jun 2012

That's how we do it here (UK). Once the polls close, all the ballots are dumped on a big table where a team of local volunteers will count them, watched by local representatives of each party and the local returning officer. Anyone can object to any ballot at any time but, since it's just putting a pencil cross in a box, there's rarely any difficulty working out who the vote was meant for. Error rate is almost non-existent and we usually know who's won within five or six hours (last election took longer because it was incredibly close).

 

gregoire

(192 posts)
18. "rarely any difficulty" ummm, no
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 06:26 PM
Jun 2012

You don't know Republicans. They'll lie and say that pencil lines don't exist. Just look at what they did in FLA to the poor voters who punched holes in cards. They lied and said punching a hole was not sufficient unless they also removed the piece that was still connected. They also lied and would claim more than one hole was punched when it wasn't. The rarely any difficulty thing won't work with the stupid people in this country.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»Should all states go back...