Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(116,478 posts)
Fri Nov 1, 2024, 03:03 PM Nov 1

Everett initiative asks: Should the Snohomish River have legal rights?

EVERETT — Everett voters will decide next Tuesday if the Snohomish River should have legal rights.

If Initiative 24-03 passes, any city resident could take anyone negatively impacting the watershed’s health to court.

Individuals, companies or businesses found responsible for disturbing the watershed would be liable for for the damages, and would have to pay City Hall for restoration projects.

The entire Snohomish River Basin watershed covers 1,856 square miles spanning Snohomish and King counties. However, the ordinance only applies to the watershed within Everett city limits. The boundaries include contributing creeks and wetlands, such as Langus Riverfront Park Creek, Union Slough and Port Gardner Bay.

https://www.heraldnet.com/news/everett-initiative-asks-should-the-snohomish-river-have-legal-rights/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everett initiative asks: Should the Snohomish River have legal rights? (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 1 OP
Yes !!! Karadeniz Nov 1 #1
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Everett initiative asks: ...