Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Virginia
Related: About this forumTwo bidders who sought Charlottesville's Lee statue file letter protesting plan to melt it down
EDITOR'S PICK
Two bidders who sought Charlottesville's Lee statue file letter protesting plan to melt it down
BY TYLER HAMMEL The Daily Progress 10 hrs ago
Two bidders who sought Charlottesvilles Robert E. Lee monument have filed a protest letter, charging that the bid process to rid the city of Lees statue was disastrously arbitrary and that it resulted in a capricious, illegal award.
Trevilian Station Battlefield Foundation and the Ratcliffe Foundation, on behalf of its subsidiary Ellenbrook Museum, filed the letter Dec. 14. The foundations are represented by attorney Ralph Main, who also represented various Charlottesville area residents in a previous Monument Fund-backed lawsuit against the city over votes to remove the Lee and Jackson statues.
Instead of transparent: opaque. Instead of regular and managed: improvised and lawless. Instead of careful and fair consideration: a cursory midnight discussion and preconcerted effort to flout the legislative limit on City Councils authority, Main wrote in the letter to the city.
The protest letter comes in response to the city council vote on Dec. 7 to accept a bid from the Jefferson School American Heritage Center to melt down the Lee statue and then commission a new piece of community art. Many hailed the council decision as visionary and the Jefferson School plan as hopeful, a way for the city to move beyond the violence and divisiveness that the Lee statue has engendered over the years.
{snip}
According to the bid protest letter, the award to the Jefferson School was illegal and the award/voting process violated various state and local procedures.
Main also argues that the city does not have the authority to destroy a statue, directly or indirectly, based on unsuccessful attempts in 2020 to amend the state code to allow localities to alter or destroy monuments. It remains unclear whether donating a monument to a group that wishes to destroy or alter it does indeed violate the updated state code.
{snip}
Two bidders who sought Charlottesville's Lee statue file letter protesting plan to melt it down
BY TYLER HAMMEL The Daily Progress 10 hrs ago
Two bidders who sought Charlottesvilles Robert E. Lee monument have filed a protest letter, charging that the bid process to rid the city of Lees statue was disastrously arbitrary and that it resulted in a capricious, illegal award.
Trevilian Station Battlefield Foundation and the Ratcliffe Foundation, on behalf of its subsidiary Ellenbrook Museum, filed the letter Dec. 14. The foundations are represented by attorney Ralph Main, who also represented various Charlottesville area residents in a previous Monument Fund-backed lawsuit against the city over votes to remove the Lee and Jackson statues.
Instead of transparent: opaque. Instead of regular and managed: improvised and lawless. Instead of careful and fair consideration: a cursory midnight discussion and preconcerted effort to flout the legislative limit on City Councils authority, Main wrote in the letter to the city.
The protest letter comes in response to the city council vote on Dec. 7 to accept a bid from the Jefferson School American Heritage Center to melt down the Lee statue and then commission a new piece of community art. Many hailed the council decision as visionary and the Jefferson School plan as hopeful, a way for the city to move beyond the violence and divisiveness that the Lee statue has engendered over the years.
{snip}
According to the bid protest letter, the award to the Jefferson School was illegal and the award/voting process violated various state and local procedures.
Main also argues that the city does not have the authority to destroy a statue, directly or indirectly, based on unsuccessful attempts in 2020 to amend the state code to allow localities to alter or destroy monuments. It remains unclear whether donating a monument to a group that wishes to destroy or alter it does indeed violate the updated state code.
{snip}
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two bidders who sought Charlottesville's Lee statue file letter protesting plan to melt it down (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2021
OP
Botany
(72,667 posts)1. ATTN Southern Sympathizes:
* The war was over 156 years ago. Your side lost.
* Robert E Lee was not a nice man. He had slaves that tried to "run away" from his plantation
horse whipped and then had those wounds washed with salt water a few days later.
* The C.S.A. was about the violent end of the United States and the keeping of human beings
as slaves.
* If the Biblical Jesus was alive in the south prior to the Civil War "they" would have tried to make him a slave.
old as dirt
(1,972 posts)2. I've seen that picture before. In a music video.
In an old Bambuco Patiano.
Popayán - Son del Tuno
old as dirt
(1,972 posts)3. Melt it down. (nt)
marble falls
(62,527 posts)4. Melt it down to make bars for the cells of the Jan 6 rebels.