Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(71,149 posts)
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 05:31 AM Oct 9

Candidates for NC Supreme Court highlight differing judicial philosophies

Judge Jefferson Griffin, the Republican candidate for the North Carolina Supreme Court, said his Democratic opponent Justice Allison Riggs, is advancing a liberal agenda through the courts and violating judicial conduct rules.

Griffin, who currently serves on the state’s Court of Appeals, said Riggs has made public statements about how she would rule on cases that could come before the court. “My opponent has staked out her position on issues. She has explicitly said how she would vote on cases, and these are all clear violations of our Code of Judicial Conduct,” Griffin said at a GOP judicial candidate forum on Monday.

“It’s been frustrating to watch as a citizen, as a jurist, as a lawyer, to watch how far she would take judicial elections down, and it goes back to that first point is because their ideas, their judicial philosophy, don’t work.”

Griffin, whose campaign website identifies him as an adherent to the controversial conservative judicial concepts of originalism and textualism, didn’t specifically mention which statements he was referring to. Last month, after Riggs released a campaign ad in which she said she will protect abortion rights, critics from her opponent’s camp charged that she was in violation of the state’s Judicial Code of Conduct.



https://ncnewsline.com/2024/10/09/candidates-for-nc-supreme-court-highlight-differences/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Candidates for NC Supreme Court highlight differing judicial philosophies (Original Post) RandySF Oct 9 OP
Question... OldBaldy1701E Oct 9 #1
Every One Of The Repukes... GB_RN Oct 9 #2

OldBaldy1701E

(6,609 posts)
1. Question...
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 06:14 AM
Oct 9

Is his middle initial D'?

So, he wants to act like this person affirming her personal position on topics, is a breach of judicial conduct?

GB_RN

(3,217 posts)
2. Every One Of The Repukes...
Wed Oct 9, 2024, 06:40 AM
Oct 9

Last edited Thu Oct 10, 2024, 06:31 PM - Edit history (1)

On the NCSC is a giant douchebag. One of them is the son of State Senator & president-pro-tem, Phil Berger. The shit doesn’t fall far from the dog’s ass.

Once Berger was sworn in (defeated the then-Chief Justice, Beasley by a few hundred votes), the new CJ, Paul Newby, deliberately “revisited” the prior court’s ruling on gerrymandering so they could overturn it. Nothing but pure power grabs by these dicks, and he has the temerity to say Justice Riggs’ liberal “ideas, [her] judicial philosophy don’t work”? He can go fornicate with himself. And while he’s at it, ingest a bag of Richards.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Carolina»Candidates for NC Supreme...