Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Colorado

El Supremo

(20,384 posts) Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:50 PM Nov 2014

They just called CD6 for Coffman.

I guess I'll never live in congressional district seated by a Democrat. CD6 has been Republican since its inception. Even after redistricting favoring Democrats. Romanoff just wasn't good enough.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

They just called CD6 for Coffman. (Original Post) El Supremo Nov 2014 OP

He was a very good speaker of the house. kaiden Nov 2014 #1

i was in the fourth for years fizzgig Nov 2014 #2

Crap DavidDvorkin Nov 2014 #3

For the DUers who truly believe that a Democrat running on Democratic values mountain grammy Nov 2014 #4

kaiden

(1,314 posts)

1. He was a very good speaker of the house.

Reply to El Supremo (Original post)

Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:54 PM

Nov 2014

I feel your pain. Coffman was our rep until redistricting. We have Polis now.

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)

2. i was in the fourth for years

Reply to El Supremo (Original post)

Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:55 PM

Nov 2014

betsy markey was a fluke. i was so happy to be redistricted into the second, but i know your pain.

DavidDvorkin

(19,952 posts)

3. Crap

Reply to El Supremo (Original post)

Tue Nov 4, 2014, 10:24 PM

Nov 2014

And Gardner is the winner over Udall.

mountain grammy

(27,379 posts)

4. For the DUers who truly believe that a Democrat running on Democratic values

Reply to El Supremo (Original post)

Wed Nov 5, 2014, 11:25 AM

Nov 2014

will always win, take a look at Andrew Romanoff. I don't think there's a candidate out there who ran more on Democratic values than Andrew.

Reply to this discussion