Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Arizona
Related: About this forumSome judge and prop recommendations
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=1YVEXoqNm_go2Ecc-NO1tA
The part that is cut off reads:
Retain:
All judges not listed, including all judges in Coconino, Pima, and Pinal Counties
Prop 309 is a no, Prop 310 is a yes.
This is from the group Gavel Watch www.cebv.us/2022-ballot
"Civic Engagement Beyond Voting
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some judge and prop recommendations (Original Post)
QED
Oct 2022
OP
marybourg
(13,238 posts)1. Thanx. Bookmarked.
MLAA
(18,712 posts)2. Thanks, I got my ballot yesterday.
QED
(3,008 posts)3. Mine arrived today.
Response to QED (Original post)
Ptah This message was self-deleted by its author.
QED
(3,008 posts)6. Thanks for posting the whole image.
I don't have a hosting service for pics. Yet.