Two flowers from our new flat.
These are by the front door. I was moving a couple of boxes before the move. Dodging the rain while doing so.
I meant to take these flowers Friday but....
Here is the development of phone cameras. Both of these flowers were moving in the breeze when I hit the shutter.
I can remember back in the days of film waiting for a short break in the breeze and camera on a tripod to get images this clear.
= new reply since forum marked as read
I used with my 4X5. Thought it would be overkill for my phone.. 
Computational photography.
Too complex to describe (by me) so here is what DPR says.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/9828658229/computational-photography-part-i-what-is-computational-photography
Computational photography part I: What is computational photography?
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/9828658229/computational-photography-part-i-what-is-computational-photography/2
Stacking: 90% of success of mobile cameras
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0681063194/computational-photography-part-ii-computational-sensors-and-optics
Computational photography part II: Computational sensors and optics
I took some close-up photos of Mariposa Lilies at the fixed f/1.8 iphone setting and lo, I got depth of field that should NOT accrue to an f/1.8 lens. And with older model phones.
Also, love the flower photos. That's what enticed me to go down this path some 55 years ago.
I still use big and powerful cameras as well, and wait for the breeze to calm down.
I don't use focus stacking on them. Next iteration of my photography, as in processing RAW data.
The jpegs are gorgeous already.
Keep up the great work. (fun) 
give me some reading to do.
Thanks, I think...
