Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the andromeda galaxy (Original Post) moonshinegnomie Jan 2024 OP
wow. AllaN01Bear Jan 2024 #1
That's Amazing! question everything Jan 2024 #2
What optics ? nt eppur_se_muova Jan 2024 #3
astrotech ed 72ii telescope and a sony a6000 camera moonshinegnomie Jan 2024 #4
Omigod, my dear moonshinegnomie! CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2024 #5
Whoa! 2naSalit Jan 2024 #6
So beautiful. Thanks for sharing.n/t livetohike Jan 2024 #7
Good job!!! relayerbob Jan 2024 #8
Spectacular achievement Pluvious Jan 2024 #9
It's much larger than the moon .... relayerbob Jan 2024 #11
Holy crap ! Pluvious Jan 2024 #14
And it's heading our way. speak easy Jan 2024 #22
Brace yourself! PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2024 #32
Oh crap. progressoid Jan 2024 #33
I had no idea... Hekate Jan 2024 #39
I have seen it many times with averted vision from suburbs of NYC. marybourg Jan 2024 #12
How did you track it over the three hours? relayerbob Jan 2024 #10
i have a mount that tracks the stars moonshinegnomie Jan 2024 #13
Very nice.I thought you might have an equatorial mount relayerbob Jan 2024 #15
an eq mount is required for long exposures moonshinegnomie Jan 2024 #17
Right. I wasn't sure how much your software could compensate for that relayerbob Jan 2024 #29
Very cool ... aggiesal Jan 2024 #16
I wouldn't have thought that you could get such an astounding photo from home equipment. Chainfire Jan 2024 #18
WOW!!! AverageOldGuy Jan 2024 #19
Amazing! Bayard Jan 2024 #20
That's nice! ArkansasDemocrat1 Jan 2024 #21
mine scope is not much bigger. its a 72 mm refractor moonshinegnomie Jan 2024 #24
In one of my astronomy classes, the instructor had us expose a negative while tracking a certain nondescript star ArkansasDemocrat1 Jan 2024 #27
Nice! BigOleDummy Jan 2024 #23
WOW❗❗ Duppers Jan 2024 #25
Amazing tazkcmo Jan 2024 #26
Helluva shot! Thanks! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2024 #28
Stunning! Grumpy Old Guy Jan 2024 #30
That is glorious! MLAA Jan 2024 #31
Just breathtaking! niyad Jan 2024 #34
Simply stunning! Bluethroughu Jan 2024 #35
Our next Galactic acquisition!! IbogaProject Jan 2024 #36
Nice job! jerseyjim Jan 2024 #37
Bravo! Very beautiful! burrowowl Jan 2024 #38
Stunning -- stunning. Thank you. Hekate Jan 2024 #40
I couldn't help myself. RandySF Jan 2024 #41
Beautiful! (I wish I had a dark sky at night. Too much city light.) Oopsie Daisy Jan 2024 #42
i shot this in the city moonshinegnomie Jan 2024 #43
That's impressive. Oopsie Daisy Jan 2024 #44
austin texas moonshinegnomie Jan 2024 #45

CaliforniaPeggy

(152,475 posts)
5. Omigod, my dear moonshinegnomie!
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 12:07 PM
Jan 2024

This is incredibly beautiful. I can almost see it turning in space.

Thank you for sharing!

Pluvious

(4,809 posts)
9. Spectacular achievement
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 12:58 PM
Jan 2024

I still remember the moment when if first saw Saturn and its rings through a telescope,
it was almost creepy, seemly so surreal

Seeing our "neighboring" galaxy directly must feel the same

If we could fully see M31 unaided in our night sky, is the arc span wide enough to resolve its form ?

marybourg

(13,215 posts)
12. I have seen it many times with averted vision from suburbs of NYC.
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 01:01 PM
Jan 2024

It’s clearly oval in shape, and white, but nothing else can be resolved.

moonshinegnomie

(2,922 posts)
13. i have a mount that tracks the stars
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 01:02 PM
Jan 2024

i use a zwo am5 mount. once its polar aligned with the earth axis it rotates with the earth. what i do is take a series of exposures and use software to stack teh resulting images.

moonshinegnomie

(2,922 posts)
17. an eq mount is required for long exposures
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 01:26 PM
Jan 2024

an alt az mount can take short exposures but suffer from field rotation for anything longer than 30 seconds or less depending on teh location of tge object

 

Chainfire

(17,757 posts)
18. I wouldn't have thought that you could get such an astounding photo from home equipment.
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 01:29 PM
Jan 2024

Congrats, it is gorgeous.

moonshinegnomie

(2,922 posts)
24. mine scope is not much bigger. its a 72 mm refractor
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 03:59 PM
Jan 2024

teh equatorial mount is what makes the difference. it eliminates field rotation which an alt az mount has

ArkansasDemocrat1

(3,213 posts)
27. In one of my astronomy classes, the instructor had us expose a negative while tracking a certain nondescript star
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 05:08 PM
Jan 2024

(manually mind you) with the university's big reflecting telescope (naturally with an EQ mount) and then covered the piggyback SCT as class ended. The next night we had class we developed it (developer, stop-bath, fixer & wash) and then we were looking at something - not at all- printed in our Norton's Star Atlas. Turns out we were tracking Halley when it had just started to offgas but wasn't quite nekkid eye visible yet. We tracked it over several classes.

BigOleDummy

(2,274 posts)
23. Nice!
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 03:36 PM
Jan 2024

My brother-in-law does astrophotography too. Spends days after a shoot processing! Has some nice stuff too.

Oopsie Daisy

(4,557 posts)
44. That's impressive.
Mon Jan 8, 2024, 10:30 AM
Jan 2024

You're very fortunate. Which city? DC and Alexandria have so much light pollution that it's difficult to see anything other than the brightest stars (and the moon.)

moonshinegnomie

(2,922 posts)
45. austin texas
Mon Jan 8, 2024, 11:32 AM
Jan 2024

there are things you can do to help with light pollution.
for things like galaxies i use a light pollution filter that does an ok job especially on brighter objects
for nebula its a little easier. nebulas tend to emit light in only a couple very specific frequencies. there are filters that will block any light outside those frequencies.

just because you cant see objects with the naked eye they are still able to be photographed,especially the brighter objects like andromeda,orion,the pleaides etc.... I looked at a dark sky map,theres a scale called the bortle scale that show how dark the skies are. im in whats called bortle 7. for you it looks like belle view /bell haven are the same darkness as me


dark sky map
https://www.lightpollutionmap.info/#zoom=4.00&lat=38.7944&lon=-77.0469&state=eyJiYXNlbWFwIjoiTGF5ZXJCaW5nUm9hZCIsIm92ZXJsYXkiOiJ3YV8yMDE1Iiwib3ZlcmxheWNvbG9yIjpmYWxzZSwib3ZlcmxheW9wYWNpdHkiOjYwLCJmZWF0dXJlc29wYWNpdHkiOjg1fQ==

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»the andromeda galaxy