Tech Billionaires Want Christians to Believe in AI
In an illustration, a painting of Jesus walking on water is altered to make him appear to be holding a green computer chip. He appears to be walking toward his disciples, who are gathered in a boat nearby. Credit: Nicolás Ortega/Jesus Walks On Water, Ivan Aivazovsky/WikiArt
Kiera Butler
May+June 2026 Issue Mother Jones
In early January, a short essay by a little-known AI entrepreneur turned internet philosopher named Will Manidis went viral on X. The post was mostly an attempt to explain why Boston, where Manidis lived before relocating to New York a few years ago, had failed as a tech hub. He pointed to a suite of reasons for the slow decline of the citys once-crackling biotech scene, mainly the usual culprits of overregulation and overtaxation. But at the core of Manidis argument was something much deeper: The heart of the problem was the growing consensus among Bostons stodgy elites that there was something unsettling and possibly even dangerous about the rapid pace of technological development. That mounting uneasiness about techand especially artificial intelligencelay beneath the decisions that sealed the fate of Bostons tech scene.
The average American understands AI is a thing that wastes water, skyrockets power costs, and scams their grandparents in exchange for exposing children to deviant sexual content, sports gambling, and all other manner of sin, he writes. If we cannot articulate why innovation is a moral imperative, we can expect the entire technology industry to end up like Boston. First taxed, then looted, then exhausted. And well be stuck wondering where it all went.
Manidis, who describes himself as a Christian, writes about religious matters on X and his Substack. When I called to talk with him about this idea of tech as a moral imperative, he used a theological metaphor: The mix of oligarchs and tech people and tech money and tech politics and the tech right, he told me, theyve just been unable to communicate a coherent apologetic.
His termapologeticrefers to the project of defending the mysteries of faith to nonbelievers. The Christian tradition of apologetics is rich. Its brightest lights include St. Paul, Thomas Aquinas, and C.S. Lewisall of whom made the case for their faith not by biblical invocation or surrender to the divine, but rather through engagement, rational arguments, and evidence. Manidis believes AI needs those kinds of defenders, because the public appears to be losing faith in it.
Snip...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/04/ai-religious-right-christianity-thiel-katherine-boyle-trae-stephens/
Sector 001
(349 posts)
marble falls
(72,312 posts)The beat goes on, the beat goes on
Drums keep pounding a rhythm to the brain
La-de-da-de-de, la-de-da-de-da
Charleston was once the rage, ah-huh
History has turned the page, ah-huh
The miniskirt's the current thing, ah-huh
Teenybopper is our newborn king, ah-huh
DBoon
(25,087 posts)Tech billionaires want to be worshiped as gods
TBF
(36,944 posts)"Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." (A Contribution to the Critique of Hegels Philosophy of Right - Marx)
Honestly, given all that is going on, I am of the opinion that we're better off with Leo in charge.