Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(18,321 posts)
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 09:29 AM Dec 13

Golden Dome: The Astronomical Cost of Defeating 'Any Foreign Aerial Attack'

Just days into his second administration, President Donald Trump signed an executive order attempting to do what no other commander in chief has done: build a system for the US to “deter—and defend its citizens and critical infrastructure against—any foreign aerial attack on the Homeland.”

The threats that the so-called Golden Dome is meant to defeat sit mainly in the arsenals of Russia, China and North Korea, which together have hundreds of nuclear missiles and thousands of other weapons that could be used to wage war on the US.

The US has historically relied on a policy of nuclear deterrence, and a limited system of ground-based missile interceptors in Alaska and California, to fend off such an attack. But Trump’s Golden Dome would go much further.

The initiative is intended to create layers of defense systems from the ground to space that will stop incoming missiles launched from anywhere in the world. It would uniquely rely on a system of space-based interceptor satellites that track and destroy missiles in orbit as they hurtle toward a destination on Earth—technology that doesn’t yet exist.

Even if Golden Dome does become operational, there’s no guarantee the system will be 100% effective. What it will look like, who will make it and how much it will cost have still not been made public.

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-golden-dome/?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc2NTYzNjE2OSwiZXhwIjoxNzY2MjQwOTY5LCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJUNzRMNE1LR0lGUk0wMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiJDNjgyQTUwQzJCRDM0MTFCQTgwQjEwQjZEQjczQzM1MSJ9.CNS6Er8AfFdGZFcF13LwrIj0dRGjMDlEQYo1me8XQ1Q

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Golden Dome: The Astronomical Cost of Defeating 'Any Foreign Aerial Attack' (Original Post) Zorro Dec 13 OP
Of course it is "gold", him and his billionaire buddies will make a killing. A titanium dome would make doc03 Dec 13 #1
Oh, great. $1.1 Trillion dollars of destabilization. paleotn Dec 13 #2
DOA or boondoggle? thought crime Dec 13 #3

doc03

(38,788 posts)
1. Of course it is "gold", him and his billionaire buddies will make a killing. A titanium dome would make
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 10:08 AM
Dec 13

more sense, gold may be pretty, but it is very weak and soft.

paleotn

(21,423 posts)
2. Oh, great. $1.1 Trillion dollars of destabilization.
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 10:27 AM
Dec 13

If the system actually works, which is very highly unlikely, it makes the chances of a nuclear exchange much more likely in the short and medium term, before full implementation.

The key to nuclear stability in a proliferated world is the fact that no nuclear power can incinerate another nuclear power without also being incinerated in turn. That's worked for 80 years and still works today. Even between India and Pakistan which is no small feat. Seems nobodies crazy enough to risk almost certain incineration.

If we were getting close to becoming invulnerable to nuclear attack, our not-friends, and even some of or friends, would begin to seriously wonder if the US thought nuclear war was now winnable. Stands to reason we would because it would be true. But that's the nightmare scenario. Instead of allowing their nuclear deterrent to become irrelevant and face being under the US nuclear thumb, our not-friends would be incentivized to strike first, both nuclear and conventional. They simply cannot have a nuclear tipped, US super hegemony. No one will allow that. Certainly not with our record of electing crazed jackasses.

The only way to avoid that is to share the technology, if it works which it won't, with everyone globally and the cost of deployment. That would make nuclear weapons close to impotent. That's never, ever going to happen.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Golden Dome: The Astronom...