Trump's tariffs will be costly, but that's not the worst part
Donald Trump is obsessed with raising tariffs. Though its tricky to predict how much he will hike them, they will be higher than todays average rate of 2.4 percent. Hardly a day passes without Trump mentioning how beautiful and profitable tariffs are. And this week, he laid bare why he will raise them this year: He needs money to pay for bigger tax cuts.
While vowing to make these tax cuts even better with no taxes on tips, Trump wrote on his social media site: It will all be made up with tariffs, and much more, from countries that have taken advantage of the U.S. for years.
This is Trumps worst argument for tariffs yet. The math doesnt add up. Extending his 2017 tax cuts for another decade would cost $5 trillion. But putting 10 percent tariffs on all imports (plus more on China), as the president-elect has suggested, would raise about $2.7 trillion over the next decade, and that is an optimistic estimate.
At some point, it will sink in that American consumers are the ones who pay for hefty tariffs. A typical household would pay more than $1,200 a year. The Tax Foundation ran the numbers and found that the bottom 40 percent of households would lose, because they would pay more in tariffs than they would get back in tax cuts. The Peterson Institute for International Economics found that the bottom 80 percent would be worse off, and only the richest Americans would benefit.
https://wapo.st/3DStn3W
ThoughtCriminal
(14,374 posts)is a requirement for ALL GOP policies. It's the only reason they exist.
no_hypocrisy
(49,444 posts)America's economy is predicated on consumerism, that is, purchasing goods and services.
If the price of eggs irked a few people, wait until they can't afford (or find) Florida/California oranges or other produce. Or meat, chicken, etc. that have to be fed grass or grain.
Add to that reciprocal tariffs for countries that will cancel contracts with us and won't import our agriculture.
Less money spent means less tax revenue. Tax cuts? Do they mean anything when there is less taxes being collected?
And with less money collected, how to fund the government, period. Forget about FEMA and natural disasters. You think that $38 trillion deficit is high? You just wait.