'This Is a Cover Story': Leon Panetta Says Trump Is Hiding the True Reason Behind Air Force One Switch
Source: MEDIAite
Jul 8th, 2026, 3:30 pm
Former CIA Director Leon Panetta wasnt buying President Donald Trumps excuse for switching planes for his journey home from the NATO Summit in Turkey. On Wednesday, Shawn McCreesh of The New York Times asked Trump during a news conference in Ankara why he wasnt flying the much-ballyhooed new Air Force One home.
The $400 million jet was a gift from the Qatari government and has long prompted security concerns. Its flying to Europe to one of the big bases, two or three of the big bases where we can show it to the people, Trump said. And well be going home by normal methods. But we, we have it going to Europe to a couple of bases, actually one in particular, but its going to go to a couple of bases so the soldiers can see it because its truly magnificent.
Panetta, who served under President Barack Obama, appeared on MS NOWs The Moment with Katy Tur Wednesday and he wasnt buying it:
LEON PANETTA: You know, Ive always been concerned about security issues with this kind of plane thats built by another country, regardless of the fact that that country, we may have good relations with that country. The fact is that for from a security point of view, you have got to be concerned that there are going to be efforts to try to gather intelligence.
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/this-is-a-cover-story-leon-panetta-says-trump-is-hiding-the-true-reason-behind-air-force-one-switch/
modrepub
(4,274 posts)But the thought of gathering "intelligence" from Trump made me
Why bug his plane? He pretty much just says whatever he wants regardless of what secrets he shouldn't be sharing publicly.
Skittles
(173,895 posts)stupid fuck is always shooting off his mouth, a mixture of gibberish and classified info - it never fucking ends
rubbersole
(11,365 posts)He wants his cut if somebody is bugging him. It wouldn't surprise me to discover Putin told him where to place listening devices on that 90 minute phone call.
Skittles
(173,895 posts)Dementia Donald is so out of it most of the time who knows what he is telling people and what they are telling him.
JT45242
(4,270 posts)But educator speak for intelligence and spy/military terms for intelligence are very different.
Information probably -- smarts, not a snowball's chance in hell
AZ8theist
(7,809 posts)Just buy a membership to Merde Lardo and use the bathroom.
You'll find every piece of intelligence you ever wanted there.
Skittles
(173,895 posts)it's not like they were hired for their intelligence and competence
QueerDuck
(2,424 posts)... that the flight controls could be remotely disabled and sent into an uncontrolled nosedive. Or that the countermeasures (if any ever existed) could also be disabled. The on-board wifi could have had a key-logger that captured text messages and passwords.
What a fucking waste of money... all for an fragile little ego.
jmowreader
(53,594 posts)Killing off Trump means he's replaced with someone who won't be our frenemies' lapdog.
On the other hand, the keylogger system is a definite possibility, as are satellite feeds that send any audio from inside the plane to a collection bird for relay to the Kremlin.
OldBaldy1701E
(11,905 posts)More like keeping it from being secured here. He is convinced that this is his plane and once he is out of office, that he will just keep it.
Like a lot of other things he has done during his time in the Oval Office. I would not be surprised if he wanted to empty out the White House once he leaves.
Just as I would not be surprised if we let him.
Orrex
(67,615 posts)Hugin
(38,142 posts)And
It was outfitted by the highest no-bid contract.
Pathetic.
Throw a tarp over it.
BumRushDaShow
(174,184 posts)IIIRC, on 9/11, when they had Shrub up in the air for hours and hours in AF1 due to not knowing how many planes were co-opted as weapons, there was a fuel jet in the convoy with the fighter jets escorting AF1.
twodogsbarking
(20,009 posts)mobeau69
(12,501 posts)purr-rat beauty
(1,730 posts)How much tax payers dollars went into this fucking albatross
That should be IMPEACHABLE shit.
It was a completely unnecessary and expensive expenditure.
Hugin
(38,142 posts)An albatross or a Potemkin Chicken.
returnee
(1,033 posts)Trump is a traitor. God knows what intel hes already given away. I would suggest a case could be made for Aileen Cannon suborning treason.
jeffreyi
(2,625 posts)Y'know. The big movie. Something about a horse.
DrFunkenstein
(8,965 posts)Perhaps there was a health scare.
Peacetrain
(24,327 posts)Ol Janx Spirit
(1,155 posts)...which also by nature need to emit some sort of signal--RF, acoustic, EMF, optical--which should make them easier to detect than merely intelligence gathering sensors.
My suspicion is that the hurried retrofitting of the aircraft means that it does not posses the full defensive capabilities of the VC-25A and someone finally lost enough sleep over it to grow a spine after seeing how effective Iran has been with the very limited resources they still have. Believing a handheld rocket of some sort could bring down the underdefended Graft Force One is likely what caused this panic.
It is also interesting that "passengers on the aircraft were instructed to keep their windows down during the flight, and according to flight data, the plane carrying the president did not turn on its tracker until it was over the Black Sea near Istanbul." ( https://abcnews.com/Politics/secret-service-urged-trump-depart-turkey-air-force/story?id=134606227 )
Why did passengers have to keep their window shades down?
moniss
(9,231 posts)Talitha
(8,268 posts)chouchou
(3,475 posts)Ah..Quite frankly, Donald Trump would be on the Jet....which means there's zero Intelligence.
SpankMe
(3,823 posts)(And Panetta misspoke a bit about the plane being built in "another country". It was built by Boeing in the US. The interiors, however, were installed in another country. Minor point. But, still.)
Aircraft procured for presidential use are monitored throughout the entire manufacturing process, or are thoroughly inspected to the point of nearly being disassembled before they're certified for use by POTUS. Most of the lifetime of the Qatari 747 so far has been spent outside of this monitoring window. So, nothing can be trusted. Most of a presidential aircraft is essentially a SCIF for open discussion of sensitive topics.
Behind the panels and under the floors are wiring bundles so numerous and complex, anything could be hidden in there - bugging devices, cutters, poisons, acids, communications, anything. It would be impossible to properly inspect all of it without removing it all and going through it strand by strand. Did they do that?
Every electronic box in the plane - from avionics to the panels that operate ovens - could have circuitry in them, right down to the circuit board - or even chip - level, that could be used to monitor, commandeer or disable that device or the whole aircraft. There are hundreds of boxes in the plane. Did they remove every one and test them?
There could be secret fuel cut-off valves installed in the engines that could be remotely actuated.
Did they inspect every cubic inch of the fuel tanks? Could be explosives in there. Or capsules of corrosive agents that could release over time and eat the fuel tank walls or contaminate the fuel at random times causing engines to malfuntion over the Atlantic.
Tracking devices can be as small as a sugar cube. Have they inspected every interior volume - the wings, the vertical stabilizer, the engine nacelles - for the presence of questionable or unknown devices? This is a true needle in a haystack.
Has the plane been swept for radioactive materials? Pellets of - or even dust treated with - polonium could be placed anywhere to gradually drag down the health of anyone on the plane.
The Qatari AF1 is a literal Trojan Horse. The military was stupid for even considering letting US leaders fly on the plane. I'm surprised they could find legit military pilots willing to fly it.
QueerDuck
(2,424 posts)usonian
(27,444 posts)
AllaN01Bear
(30,272 posts)otto pilot.
FakeNoose
(43,302 posts)I don't know, but it's possible. You've outlined a lot of stuff that could have happened ... and there's a lot the secret service doesn't know about this plane.
If there really is a Chump "double" he would have had to disappear as soon as the real Chump arrives. But that wouldn't have been too hard, I don't think. All the TV cameras were pointed at the real one, not at the "double."
underpants
(198,006 posts)of course this is much more serious
travelingthrulife
(5,781 posts)It will be loaded to the gills with spyware.
moniss
(9,231 posts)found the "communications" devices.
Historic NY
(40,236 posts)I seriously doubt that its has very little defensive or evasive systems on it. Iran, Turkey's neighbor has lots of big fat missiles that would love a juicy target. They have already shown their ability to reach far away targets, and are itching for revenge.
LetMyPeopleVote
(184,657 posts)Rising hostilities with Iran required President Donald Trump to shift to his original, more advanced presidential aircraft.
Whether it is a Reflecting Pool, the economy, or a 747, Donald Trump is shockingly incompetent at making things work.
— Mrs. Betty Bowers (@mrsbettybowers.bsky.social) 2026-07-09T13:16:07.073Z
https://www.ms.now/news/officials-say-trump-switched-out-new-air-force-one-over-security-concerns
The original Air Force One a Boeing VC-25A from the early 1990s is a unique military plane outfitted with these capabilities.
Link to tweet
The main concern Wednesday was the presidents need to use the command-and-control functions of the original Air Force One, according to two other former security officials. Those systems turn the plane into a flying situation room, allowing the president to receive classified intelligence briefings, communicate securely and give orders to military officers around the world.
The Qatari Boeing VC-25B originally manufactured as a passenger jet in 2012 does not have some of the original Air Force Ones equipment, and some of the jets capabilities have not been fully tested, the sources added.
This plane was built for aesthetics, not mission, one former national security official said. We know about its paint, its leather seats. But we dont know its capabilities. ....
National security officials say it typically takes years, as well as billions of dollars, to make an Air Force One aircraft safe and secure time and money that was not spent here.
Both the White House and the Air Force have previously said no shortcuts were taken with the new Air Force One, adding that the new plane is equipped with advanced technology and that critical mission requirements were prioritized over aesthetics.
AllaN01Bear
(30,272 posts)on the airplane