'Cost Me the Election': Data Centers Trigger Voter Backlash
Source: Newsweek
Published Jun 25, 2026 at 05:47 AM EDT updated Jun 25, 2026 at 05:55 AM EDT
A wave of voter anger over massive data center projects is beginning to reshape U.S. politics, with local officials and senior lawmakers losing elections after backing controversial developments tied to the artificial intelligence boom.
In Utah on Wednesday, State Senate President J. Stuart Adamsone of the most powerful Republicans in the statelost his primary election after supporting a major data center development near the Great Salt Lake, in one of the clearest signs yet of the growing political risks tied to the industry.
At the local level, the fallout was just as direct. Do I think that the data center vote cost me the election? Yes I do, former Box Elder County Commissioner Lee Perry said after conceding his primary race, after voting to advance the same project.
The defeats of Adams and multiple county officials tied to the proposal suggest that opposition to data centers is no longer confined to planning disputesbut is emerging as a voting issue capable of reshaping elections.
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/cost-me-the-election-data-centers-trigger-voter-backlash-12118327
FakeNoose
(43,010 posts)The incumbents of both parties need to be wary of any promises made by future data centers. The voters know what's really happening even if the politicians don't.
Bengus81
(10,577 posts)You wanted to build those fucking things near the Salt lake? Waiting for ones proposed on the rim of the Grand Canyon.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,783 posts)... and other tech billionaires who want big data centers to process AI and to mine bit coins. And if it takes burning many cubic miles of natural gas to run the generators, that's someone else's problem!
Constituents can pound sand.
Miguelito Loveless
(6,050 posts)they can do the Tech Bros bidding and lose the rural vote.
mwmisses4289
(5,153 posts)Sweetheart deals to the rich investors who back them regarding electric and water rates, noise, destruction of both human and wildlife habitat, deals for these places made behind closed doors and then presented to the public as fait accompli; yeah, i can see why any politician idiotic enough to vote for these things are going down.
On a side note- caught the end of a story on our local news about companies who went to AI thinking to replace their workforce are now rehiring people to replace the AI.
Crowman2009
(3,637 posts)At least with sporting venues there is a significant amount of local employment, it doesn't consume nowhere near the same amount of water & electricity, and the noise is bearable.
patphil
(9,336 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(24,451 posts)And that Dems learn sooner rather than later that no matter how much money the techbros throw at them, that if they support data centers, they do so at their own peril.
Like inflation, data centers are one of those issues where the impact cuts across all regional, racial and partisan boundaries.
odins folly
(677 posts)So in a nutshell, AI is the wave of the future, as long as EVERYONE uses it. And in order for it to work really, really good we need these gigantic, resource sucking processing plants. But we shouldnt really get too balled up about how much we deplete the natural resources because when we really get going, the AI will let us know how to refurbish the wasted resources plus we get to figure out how to get richer, and if EVERYONE is onboard with the AI this will happen sooner than later.
Heres some campaign cash to vote the right way for AI ..
maxsolomon
(39,418 posts)A data center in the Wasatch Valley is a death sentence for the water supply and the Salt Lake.
Heedless LDS-driven development has already sucked so much out of the drainage's meager volume that the Salt Lake is drying up. Even Mormons object to dust storms of toxic lake sediment.