Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,425 posts)
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 06:05 PM 2 hrs ago

Trump administration announces $17.5 billion in loans for 10 new large nuclear reactors

Source: ABC News/AP

June 23, 2026, 12:34 PM


WASHINGTON -- The Trump administration is providing $17.5 billion to speed the development of 10 new large nuclear reactors to meet the skyrocketing power demand from massive data centers.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright cited “tremendous interest” among developers of data centers that would buy the power, as well as utilities and energy companies. The nuclear plants could begin construction by 2030 and become operational in the mid-2030s, Wright and other officials said Tuesday.

“This is the start,” Wright said on a call with reporters. “We’re going to move with the players that are ready to stand up and move quickly. Once that supply chain is up and running, do we think there will be dozens of these built going forward? I’d be very surprised if there were not.”

Most U.S. nuclear power plants were built between 1970 and 1990. Only two new large reactors have been built from scratch in the United States in recent decades. Those two reactors, at Georgia Power Co.’s Plant Vogtle, were completed years late and billions of dollars over budget. The 10 new reactors will use the same design, Westinghouse’s AP1000.

Read more: https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/trump-administration-announces-175-billion-loans-10-new-134137821

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump administration announces $17.5 billion in loans for 10 new large nuclear reactors (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 2 hrs ago OP
Nuclear reactors themselves don't bother me GenThePerservering 2 hrs ago #1
True that! Hopefully... reACTIONary 1 hr ago #9
Most likely as dedicated power for data centers. pecosbob 2 hrs ago #2
And what are their plans for the nuclear waste? nt pnwmom 2 hrs ago #3
They will let Dems take care of that small problem. republianmushroom 1 hr ago #7
There is no rational reason to build new nuclear plants WSHazel 2 hrs ago #4
my $2800 solar rooftop been working silently for 18 yrrs and NO cost overrun. paid off 10 yrs ago msongs 2 hrs ago #5
But wind turbines cause cancer. republianmushroom 2 hrs ago #6
If Congress has the purse and must approve what the expenditure is for, how does F45 have the in2herbs 1 hr ago #8
These loans are financed.... reACTIONary 1 hr ago #10
Not Enough modrepub 47 min ago #11
Yeah, just wait not fooled 12 min ago #12

GenThePerservering

(4,065 posts)
1. Nuclear reactors themselves don't bother me
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 06:14 PM
2 hrs ago

it's them being built during this hapless administration.

WSHazel

(914 posts)
4. There is no rational reason to build new nuclear plants
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 06:33 PM
2 hrs ago

Future increases in demand for electricity are dependent on massive increases in data center demand, which is economically impossible. Either the LLMs are going to get a lot more efficient, reducing demand for data centers, or the LLMs fail altogether, which reduces data center demand. Either way, straight lining capacity need off projected growth while holding technology steady, is an asinine assumption.

If the markets don’t need all these data centers, they won’t need huge, fixed production power plants that use old technology like nuclear power.

If there is a gap in power needs vs. capacity and there must be more power generation, using alternative to fill the gap is the logical path since it is so much cheaper than nuclear and it doesn’t compute. It also has much shorter lead times than nuclear.

Finally, if it is determined that nuclear must be part of the equation, why wouldn’t the market wait for miniaturization of nuclear which seems likely in the next 5 years.

In other words, there is no reason to start building expensive nuclear power plants that take a decade to build, may be unnecessary, and will certainly be obsolete by the time they are operational.

msongs

(74,493 posts)
5. my $2800 solar rooftop been working silently for 18 yrrs and NO cost overrun. paid off 10 yrs ago
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 06:53 PM
2 hrs ago

in2herbs

(4,653 posts)
8. If Congress has the purse and must approve what the expenditure is for, how does F45 have the
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 07:04 PM
1 hr ago

authority to do this?

reACTIONary

(7,408 posts)
10. These loans are financed....
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 07:58 PM
1 hr ago

.....through the DOE’s Title 17 Energy Financing Program. The Title 17 program operates using existing borrowing authority, credit subsidy appropriations, and permanent loan guarantee authority established by Congress across multiple past statutes rather than a single specific congressional bill.

modrepub

(4,244 posts)
11. Not Enough
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 08:13 PM
47 min ago

The last large-scale nuclear power plant privately built cost $25B and took over a decade to build; so in today $, that price tag is on the low side.

The only way this is feasible is if the money is paid back over 30+ years. Nuclear power on a cost per megawatt basis is WAY more expensive than other forms of electricity production. It costs more to build a nuclear power plant and to operate it compared to other forms of electricity production.

So like just about everything this administration does and Republicans support, it's gonna cost taxpayers more. It's mind boggling how just about everyone thinks Republicans and Trump have a mind for business.

not fooled

(6,811 posts)
12. Yeah, just wait
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 08:47 PM
12 min ago

Presumably the power provided by any of these plants (if built) will be considered part of the grid/pool of power available to all ratepayers. All ratepayers will be paying the cost of these plants = the idea that the tech oligarchs will be covering the cost is just another lie krasnov's administration tries to fob off on the public.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump administration anno...